2
B. Lu et al. / Electrochimica Acta 340 (2020) 135974
instability during the polymerization process and the lack of suit-
able monomeric precursors [8,9,14e16], which hinders both the
fundamental understanding and practical applications of such
materials. Apart from direct polymerization condition control in
previous reports[8], the chemical structure modification of initial
monomeric precursors is also expected to provide milder poly-
merization conditions if suitable monomeric precursors can be
found. Unfortunately, little has been known on the effect of initial
monomeric chain length on the polymerization behavior and the
properties of the resultant polyselenophene. Owing to longer
conjugated chain, oligoselenophenes like biselenophene and tri-
with the 6-31G(d,p) basis set (B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)). The energy gap
(Eg,DFT) was calculated from the HOMO-LUMO gap. Electrochemical
polymerization of all the precursors was performed by a Princeton
Versa Stat 3 electrochemical workstation, with Pt wires (diameter:
1 mm) as the working/counter electrodes and an Ag/AgCl electrode
as the reference electrode. The electrolytic solution was bubbled by
nitrogen before every experiment to eliminate the effect of oxygen.
In order to get sufficient polymer films for characterization, Pt sheet
(2 ꢃ 1.5 cm2; as the working electrode) and ITO-coated glass sheet
(2 ꢃ 2 cm2; as the counter electrode) were employed for the
electrosynthesis. A Bruke Vertex 70 Fourier-transform infrared (FT-
IR) spectrometer was used to record the infrared spectra of all the
monomeric precursors and corresponding polyselenophene.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were taken by using a
VEGA II-LSU scanning electron microscope. By combining an elec-
trochemical workstation (Versa Stat 3) and a SPECORD 200 PLUS
UV-vis spectrophotometer, spectroelectrochemistry and electro-
chromic kinetic studies of the polyselenophene films were sys-
tematically investigated in a custom-made electrochemical cell
with an Ag/AgCl electrode as the reference electrode, indium tin
oxide (ITO)-coated glass slide (0.8 ꢃ 2.5 cm2) as the working
electrode, and a Pt wire (diameter: 1 mm) as the counter electrode,
respectively.
selenophene have larger
p delocalization than selenophene and
thus are much easier to oxidize while maintaining the conjugated
selenophene moieties[8,14e16]. Therefore, we propose that
increasing the initial monomeric precursor chain length is probably
an effective approach to enhance the optoelectronic performances
and stability of polyselenophene.
Herein, we carefully investigate the electropolymerization
behavior of selenophene (Se), biselenophene (2Se), and tri-
selenophene (3Se), and electropolymerize them to obtain the cor-
responding polyselenophene films. Multiple characterization
techniques including spectral, morphological, electrochemical, as
well as computational chemistry, have been used to systematically
investigate the effect of monomeric precursor chain length on the
electropolymerization behavior and the optoelectronic perfor-
mances of the resultant polyselenophene films. Moreover, high
quality polyselenophene film with excellent electrochromic per-
formance has been achieved, allowing us to successfully fabricate
patterned flexible electrochromic devices.
2.3. Synthesis
2,20-Biselenophene (2Se) and 2,2’:50,200-terselenophene (3Se)
were synthesized by Stille coupling (Fig. 1A). The detailed experi-
mental procedures are illustrated as follows.
2-Bromoselenophene. Selenophene (0.50 g, 3.80 mmol),
CH2Cl2 (4 mL), and CH3COOH (4 mL) were added into a flask and
kept at 0 ꢂC. Then N-bromosuccinimide (0.67 g, 3.80 mmol) was
slowly added and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at 0 ꢂC. After
washing with deionized water and removing the solvent, 2-
bromoselenophene (0.83 g, yield: 56%) was obtained as a colour-
less liquid by column chromatography. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
Selenophene (99%; Shanghai Vita), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2,
99.8%; J&K), acetic acid (CH3COOH, 99.8%; Shanghai Vita), N,N-
dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.9%; Tianjin Bodi), N-bromosuccini-
mide (NBS, 98%; Tianjin Bodi), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, 99%;
Sigma-Aldrich), chlorotributyltin (SnBu3Cl, J&K), n-butyllithium (n-
BuLi, 1.6 M in hexanes; J&K), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4, 99%; J&K),
acetonitrile (CH3CN, 99.9%; Superdry, water ꢁ 30 ppm, J&K), pro-
pylene carbonate (PC, 99.5%; Superdry, J&K), and poly(methyl
methacrylate) (PMMA, J&K) were used directly without any puri-
fication. Tetrahydrofuran (THF, 99%; Shanghai Vita) was distilled
from sodium benzophenone ketyl and used as the solvent for
stannylization. Tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium (Pd(PPh3)4,
99%; J&K) was used as the catalyst for Stille coupling. Tetrabuty-
lammonium hexafluorophosphate (Bu4NPF6, 99%; Shanghai Vita)
was employed as the supporting electrolyte for electrochemical
polymerization and electrochromic tests after drying in vacuum for
24 h at 60 ꢂC.
DMSO‑d6,
d ppm): 8.14 (d, 1H), 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.09 (s, 1H).
2,5-Dibromoselenophene. Selenophene (1.00 g, 7.63 mmol)
and N-bromosuccinimide (3.00 g, 16.85 mmol) were added in
tetrahydrofuran (50 mL). The solution was stirred for 12 h at room
temperature. The solvent was removed and the crude product was
purified
dibromoselenophene as a yellow liquid (2.16 g, yield: 95%). 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3,
ppm): 7.00 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3, ppm): 132.99, 115.61.
2,2′-Biselenophene (2Se). 2-Bromoselenophene (0.80 g,
3.80 mmol), tributyl(2-selenophenyl)stannane (4.79 g,
by column
chromatography
to
obtain
2,5-
d
d
11.40 mmol), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (44 mg,
10 mol%) and DMF (20 mL) were added in the flask and the mixture
was refluxed for 8 h under argon atmosphere. Then the mixture
was poured into distilled water (80 mL) and extracted with diethyl
ether. The organic phase was washed with saturated NaHCO3 so-
lution and deionized water. 2,20-Biselenophene (colorless plates,
0.71 g, yield: 71%) was purified by column chromatography. 1H
2.2. Characterization
By using a Bruker AV 400 NMR spectrometer, 1H and 13C NMR
spectral measurements were taken with trimethylsilane (TMS) as
the internal standard and CDCl3 or DMSO‑d6 as the solvent. UV-vis
absorption spectra of all samples were studied by a SPECORD 200
PLUS UV-vis spectrophotometer. An F-4500 fluorescence spectro-
photometer was employed to determine the fluorescence spectra
with the excitation and emission slit set at 5 nm. All quantum
chemistry calculations were carried out by using the Gaussian 09
program package. Without symmetry constraints, the structures of
the selenophene precursors were optimized with a hybrid Becke’s-
three-parameter Lee-Yang-Parr functional (B3LYP) in combination
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6, d ppm): 8.08 (d, 2H), 7.34 (s, 2H), 7.25 (s,
2H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6,
d ppm): 144.17, 133.09, 130.41,
126.75.
2,2’:5′,200-Terselenophene (3Se). 2,5-Dibromoselenophene
(0.30 g, 1.00 mmol), tributyl(2-selenophenyl)stannane (2.10 g,
5.00 mmol), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (116 mg,
10 mol%) and DMF (20 mL) were added in the flask and the mixture
was refluxed for 8 h under argon atmosphere. Similarly, the
mixture was poured into deionized water (80 mL) after the reac-
tion, extracted with diethyl ether, and the organic phase was
washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution and deionized water. By