8478
M. Hoshi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 8475–8478
Foster, K. L.; Beck, V. H.; Piers, W. E. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 4887–4892; (d) Gevorgyan, V.; Liu, J.-X.; Rubin,
M.; Benson, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
8919–8922; (e) Parks, D. J.; Blackwell, J. M.; Piers, W. E.
J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3090–3098; (f) Gevorgyan, V.;
Rubin, M.; Benson, S.; Liu, J.-X.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 6179–6186; (g) Gevorgyan, V.; Rubin, M.;
Liu, J.-X.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1672–
1675; (h) Rubin, M.; Schwier, T.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 1936–1940.
seen from Table 1, using each 3 mol % of B(C6F5)3 and
BH3ÆSMe2 and running the redistribution for 1 h gave
the best result (92% yield) (entry 8). To support our pro-
posed mechanism, we conducted the hydroboration of
1a with pinacolborane in the presence of a catalytic
amount
of
(E)-hex-1-enylbis(pentafluorophenyl)-
borane–dimethyl sulfide complex in place of
HB(C6F5)2ÆSMe2.8 The hydroboration proceeded in the
same way as a result, giving product 2a in a similar yield
to that when HB(C6F5)2ÆSMe2 was employed. This fact
indicates that HB(C6F5)2ÆSMe2-mediated hydroboration
involves the transfer of alk-1-enyl group from boron to
boron and the concomitant transfer of hydride.
2. (a) Parks, D. J.; Spence, R. E. vonH.; Piers, W. E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 809–811; (b) Parks, D. J.;
Piers, W. E.; Yap, G. P. A. Organometallics 1998, 17,
5492–5503.
3. For examples, see: (a) Lee, C. H.; Lee, S. J.; Park, J. W.;
Kim, K. H.; Lee, B. Y.; Oh, J. S. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
1998, 132, 231–239; (b) Walker, D. A.; Woodman, T. J.;
Hughes, D. L.; Bochmann, M. Organometallics 2001, 20,
3772–3776.
4. Soderquist, J. A.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45,
3571–3578.
5. Pereira, S.; Srebnik, M. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3127–
3128.
Hydroboration of several types of 1, which bear struc-
turally and electronically diverse substituents, with pina-
colborane was carried out under the above optimized
conditions, and the results are summarized in Table 2.
The reactions proceeded smoothly under the optimum
conditions for 1a to provide the corresponding products
29 in high yields.
6. Shirakawa, K.; Arase, A.; Hoshi, M. Synthesis 2004,
1814–1820.
In conclusion, we have found that a solution of
HB(C6F5)2ÆSMe2 in hexane is generated by the redistri-
bution reaction between B(C6F5)3 and BH3ÆSMe2 at
room temperature for 1 h. Moreover, it has been
demonstrated that a stoichiometric hydroboration of 1
with pinacolborane can be promoted by using a catalytic
amount of HB(C6F5)2ÆSMe2 generated in situ to provide
the corresponding products 2 in high yields. It is note-
worthy that not only dicyclohexylborane6,10 but also
HB(C6F5)2ÆSMe2 is capable of transferring an alk-1-enyl
group from boron to boron.
7. Analytical data for 2a agreed very closely with those in the
literature.5
8. After the redistribution reaction between B(C6F5)3
(0.04 mmol) and BH3ÆSMe2 (0.04 mmol) in hexane
(1 mL) at room temperature for 1 h, a solution of
HB(C6F5)2ÆSMe2 in hexane, thus obtained, was trans-
ferred to another reaction flask by syringe under argon. To
the stirred solution was added hex-1-yne (0.08 mmol) at
0 °C, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at room
temperature to form a solution of (E)-hex-1-enylbis-
(pentafluorophenyl)borane–dimethyl sulfide complex (11B
NMR: d 41.1) in hexane. Hex-1-yne (0.92 mmol) and
pinacolborane (1.00 mol) were added to the solution at
0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 6 h at room
temperature.
References and notes
9. Analytical data for 2 were closely in agreement with those
in the literature.5
10. (a) Arase, A.; Hoshi, M.; Mijin, A.; Nishi, K. Synth.
Commun. 1995, 25, 1957–1962; (b) Hoshi, M.; Arase, A.
Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 567–572.
1. For examples, see: (a) Piers, W. E.; Chivers, T. Chem. Soc.
Rev. 1997, 26, 345–354, and references cited therein; (b)
Ishihara, K.; Yamamoto, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
527–538, and references cited therein; (c) Blackwell, J. M.;