S. An et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 1112–1116
1115
this context, different inhibitory potency of shikonin
derivatives against hACAT-1 and -2 may have resulted
from the degree of lipophilicity provided by acyl chain
and, providing optimal lipophilicity, three to four car-
bon length of acyl chain could increase a chance to inter-
act with catalytic site of hACAT-1 and -2 located in the
4. (a) Bocan, T. M.; Mueller, S. B.; Hendorf, P. D.; Brown,
E. Q.; Mazur, M. J.; Black, A. E. Atherosclerosis 1993, 99,
1
75; (b) Kusunoki, J.; Hansoty, D. K.; Aragane, K.;
Fallon, J. T.; Badimon, J. J.; Fisher, E. A. Circulation
001, 103, 2604; (c) Delsing, D. J.; Offerman, E. H.;
2
Duyvenvoorde, W. V.; Boom, H.; Wit, E. C.; Gijbels, M.
J.; Laarse, A.; Jukema, J. W.; Havekes, L. M.; Princen, H.
M. Circulation 2001, 103, 1778.
1
7
hydrophobic membrane. Recently, An et al. revealed
that His-386, another histidine residue imbedded in a
hydrophobic membrane, has the critical role for cataly-
sis of hACAT-1, whereas His-360 and His-399, cytoplas-
mic histidine residues, are essential for catalysis of
hACAT-2 suggesting catalysis in the plane of membrane
is limited in ACAT-1 and that catalysis of ACAT-2
takes place in the cytoplasmic side as well as hydropho-
bic membrane. We discovered that compound 2 contain-
ing isopropyl moiety preferentially inhibited hACAT-2
than hACAT-1, whereas compound 5, equivalent com-
pound with compound 2 except containing n-propyl
moiety instead of isopropyl moiety, considerably inhib-
ited both hACAT-1 and -2. Thus, we could speculate
that this isopropyl moiety of shikonin derivatives might
specifically interact with catalytic site of hACAT-2
located in the cytoplasmic side.
5
. For recent reviews of ACAT inhibitor, see (a) Giovannoni,
M. P.; Dal Piaz, V.; Vergelli, C.; Barlocco, D. Mini-Rev.
Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 576; (b) Sliskovic, D. R.; Picard, J.
A.; Krause, B. R. Prog. Med. Chem. 2002, 39, 121.
. Nissen, S. E.; Tuzcu, E. M.; Brewer, H. B.; Sipahi, I.;
Nicholls, S. J.; Ganz, P.; Schoenhagen, P.; Waters, D. D.;
Pepine, C. J.; Crowe, T. D.; Davidson, M. H.; Deanfield,
J. E.; Wisniewski, L. M.; Hanyok, J. J.; Kassalow, L. M.
N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 1253.
6
7
. Lee, W. S.; Lee, D. W.; Baek, Y. I.; An, S. J.; Cho, K. H.;
Choi, Y. K.; Kim, H. J.; Park, H. Y.; Bae, K. H.; Jeong, T.
S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3109.
8. The dried roots of L. erythrorhizon (500 g) were cut into
small pieces and extracted with CHCl3 (2 L) at room
temperature for 3 days. After filtration, the solution was
evaporated to remove CHCl
the inhibitory activity against hACAT-1 and -2 (87% and
2% inhibition at 100 lg/mL), and was chromatographed
3
. The extract (11 g) showed
6
on a silica gel (230–400 mesh, Merck, Ø50 · 150 mm),
eluting with n-hexane/EtOAc (10:1, 5:1, 1:1, and EtOAc),
to yield eight fractions. Each fraction was monitored by
in vitro ACAT activity assay. Purification of fraction 2
was carried out on Sephadex LH-20 column eluting with
MeOH to yield five subfractions. Subfraction 1 was
further purified by silica gel (230–400 mesh, Merck,
Ø50 · 150 mm) chromatography, eluted with n-hexane/
EtOAc (10:1) to yield 1 (50 mg). Active fraction 1 was
separated by RP C18 (40–63 mesh, Merck, Ø30 · 100 mm)
In summary, we have discovered a new class of hACAT
inhibitors. Shikonin derivatives (1–3) were isolated by
bioassay-guided fractionation from the CHCl extracts
3
of L. erythrorhizon roots. The compounds 5–11 were
modified using semi-synthesis of shikonin (4). Among
them, compound 7 exhibited the most potent hACAT-
1
and -2 inhibitory activities with IC50 values of 13.8
and 25.1 lM, respectively. Notably, we confirmed the
ACAT inhibition capacity of compound 7 in cell-based
assay system, newly established in our laboratory via
construction of stable cell line expressing hACAT-1 or
2
column chromatography, eluted with MeOH/H O (9:1) to
yield 2 (30 mg). Fraction 4 was purified by chromatogra-
phy on silica gel (230–400 mesh, Merck, Ø50 · 150 mm),
eluted with n-hexane/EtOAc (5:1) to yield 3 (70 mg).
-
2. Further structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies
are being pursued to find more potent and selective
inhibitors. Although the negative effects of nonselective
ACAT inhibitors have been reported, hACAT-1 or -2
selective inhibitor may prove to have clinical benefit to
reduce atherosclerosis via directly reducing the size of
9
. Physical and spectroscopic data: compound 1: C18
HREI-MS m/z: 330.1103 (calcd for C18H O [M] :
18 6
H O ;
+
18 6
1
330.1104); H NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz): d 12.57 (1H, s),
3
12.41 (1H, s), 7.18 (2H, s), 6.98 (1H, s), 6.02 (1H, dd,
J = 6.9, 4.2 Hz), 5.12 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.62 (1H, m), 2.46
1
1H, m), 2.14 (3H, s), 1.69 (3H, s), 1.57 (3H, s); C NMR
3
1
8
(
the lipid-rich core in the atherosclerotic plaques or
1
9
(CDCl , 300 MHz): d 178.2, 176.7, 169.7, 167.5, 166.9,
the absorption of cholesterol in intestine, respectively.
Thus, it is important to continue the search for ACAT
isotype-selective inhibitors.
3
1
3
48.2, 136.1, 132.8, 132.7, 131.4, 117.6, 111.8, 111.5, 69.5,
2.8, 25.7, 20.9, 17.9. Compound 2: C20 ; HREI-MS
22 6
H O
+
1
m/z: 358.1416 (calcd for C20
22 6
H O [M] : 358.1418), H
NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz): d 12.58 (1H, s), 12.42 (1H, s),
3
7
5
.18 (2H, s), 6.97 (1H, s), 6.02 (1H, dd, J = 7.5, 4.2 Hz),
.12 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.63 (2H, m), 2.48 (1H, m), 1.69
Acknowledgment
1
3
(
3H, s), 1.58 (3H, s), 1.21 (6H, dd, J = 6.9, 3.0 Hz);
C
This work was supported by grants from National Re-
search Laboratory Program of the Ministry of Science
and Technology and KRIBB Research Initiative Pro-
gram, Korea.
NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz): d 178.3, 176.8, 175.8, 167.4,
3
166.8, 148.6, 135.9, 132.8, 132.7, 131.3, 117.8, 111.8, 111.6,
69.0, 34.0, 32.9, 25.7, 18.9, 18.8, 17.9. Compound 3:
C H O ; HREI-MS m/z: 388.1522 (calcd for C H O
21 24
+
7
21 24
7
1
[
M] : 388.1521); H NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz): d 12.56
3
(
1H, s), 12.37 (1H, s), 7.15 (2H, s), 7.01 (1H, s), 6.07 (1H,
dd, J = 7.5, 4.2 Hz), 5.10 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.14 (1H, s),
.62 (1H, m), 2.57 (2H, s), 2.48 (1H, m), 1.67 (3H, s), 1.57
References and notes
2
1
3
(
3
3H, s), 1.29 (6H, d, J = 4.2 Hz); C NMR (CDCl ,
1
2
3
. Largis, E. E.; Wang, V. H.; DeVries, V. G.; Schaffer, S. A.
J. Lipid Res. 1989, 30, 681.
. Chang, T. Y.; Chang, C. C.; Cheng, D. Annu. Rev.
Biochem. 1997, 66, 613.
. Chang, T. Y.; Chang, C. C.; Lin, S.; Yu, C.; Li, B. L.;
Miyazaki, A. Curr. Opin. Lipidol 2001, 12, 289.
3
1
3
00 MHz): d 176.9, 175.4, 171.6, 168.5, 167.9, 147.4, 136.3,
33.2, 133.0, 131.3, 117.6, 111.7, 111.5, 69.7, 69.0, 46.4,
2.8, 29.2, 29.0, 25.7, 17.9.
1
0. Papageorgiou, V. P.; Assimopoulou, A. N.; Couladouros,
E. A.; David, H.; Nicolaou, K. C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1
999, 38, 270.