S. Y. Kim, J.-I. Hong / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 1951–1953
1953
Acknowledgments
N
N
N
N
+2
2+
This work was supported by the KRF (2006-312-C00592) and
Seoul R&BD. S.Y.K. is grateful to the Ministry of Education for the
award of the BK 21 fellowship.
Cu
Cu
N
N
O
OH
OH
Complex 1
Ensemble 1
Sky blue
Supplementary data
PPi
-
SO
OH
3
Synthesis and HRMS data of complex 1, color change of PV for
addition of complex 1, fluorescence emission change of ensemble
2 after addition of PPi, and the determination of association con-
stant by displacement titration are available. Supplementary data
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
Pale yellow
+N2
N
N
N
N
2+
Cu
Cu
N
References and notes
O
O
ONa
Complex 1
Ensemble 2
Quenching
1. (a) Martínez-Máñez, R.; Sancenón, F. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4419–4476; (b) Gale,
P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 1–226; (c) Wiskur, S. L.; A-Haddou, H.; Lavigne,
J. J.; Anslyn, E. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 963–972; (d) Yoon, J.; Kim, S. K.; Singh,
N. J.; Kim, K. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 355–360.
2. (a) Limpcombe, W. N.; Sträter, N. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2375–2434; (b) Nyrén, P.
Anal. Biochem. 1987, 167, 235–238; (c) Tabary, T.; Ju, L. J. Immunol. Methods 1992,
156, 55–60.
CO Na
2
PPi
Fluorescence
3. (a) McCarty, D. J. Arthritis Rheum. 1976, 19, 275–285; (b) Doherty, M. Ann.
Rheum. Dis. 1983, 42, 38–44.
Scheme 1. A schematic representation of dual signal PPi ensemble systems.
4. (a) Nishizawa, S.; Kato, Y.; Teramae, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9463–9464;
(b) Lee, D. H.; Im, J. H.; Son, S. U.; Chung, Y. K.; Hong, J.-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 7752–7753; (c) Lee, D. H.; Kim, S. Y.; Hong, J.-I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 4777–4780; (d) Lee, H. N.; Xu, Z.; Kim, S. K.; Swamy, K. M. K.; Kim, Y.; Kim, S.-
J.; Yoon, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3828–3829.
5. (a) Fabbrizzi, L.; Marcotte, N.; Stomeo, F.; Taglietti, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 3811–3814; (b) Han, M. S.; Kim, D. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3809–
3811; (c) Folmer-Andersen, J. F.; Lynch, V. M.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 7986–7987; (d) Lee, D. H.; Kim, S. Y.; Hong, J.-I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 4477–4480; (e) McDonough, M. J.; Reynolds, A. J.; Lee, W. Y. G.; Jolliffe, K. A.
Chem. Commun. 2006, 2971–2973; (f) Hanshaw, R. G.; Hilkert, S. M.; Jiang, H.;
Smith, B. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8721–8724.
respectively. When 1.2 equiv of AMP or Pi was added into solution
of ensemble 2, the fluorescence emission intensities increased two-
fold or 1.9-fold,ꢀrespectively. Other anions such as Fꢀ, Clꢀ, Brꢀ, Iꢀ,
NO3ꢀ, and AcO barely showed any changes in the fluorescence
emission intensities.
The schematic representation for the dual signal ensemble sys-
tem is illustrated in Scheme 1. Ensemble 1, composed of complex 1
and PV, turned from yellow to blue upon the addition of PPi to the
ensemble, which was caused by the displacement of weakly bound
PV by PPi. Similarly, ensemble 2, consisting of complex 1 and fluo-
rescein, revived the original fluorescence of fluorescein upon the
addition of the more strongly binding PPi to ensemble 2.
In conclusion, using quenching effect of a Cu(II) ion, we devel-
oped simple dual signal (color change and fluorescence ON–OFF)
ensemble system for detection of PPi, based on a bis(Dpa-CuII)
complex 1. There are several advantages to this system: (1) an easy
synthesis of the receptor molecules; (2) the use of commercially
available indicators; and (3) dual signaling effect (color and fluo-
rescence changes).
6. Yoshiro, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 1383–1384.
7. Synthesis of complex 1. To
a solution of a,
a0-dibromo-m-xylene (200 mg,
0.76 mmol) in MeCN were added 2.1 equiv of Cs2CO3 (520 mg), di-2-(picolyl)
amine (318 mg) and 1.5 equiv of KI (189 mg). The reaction mixture was stirred
at 60 °C overnight, and then all the volatile components were evaporated. The
residue was partitioned between CH2Cl2 and brine (ꢁ2). The combined organic
phase was washed with water, and then dried in anhydrous Na2SO4. Flash
chromatographic purification (only CH2Cl2ꢀCH2Cl2:MeOH = 20:1) afforded
2
(52% yield). Finally, complex 1 was prepared by adding aqueous solution of
Cu(ClO4)2 (2 equiv) to 2 (1 mg) in DMSO (1 ml). Characterization for complex 1
was reported previously.6 HRMS (FAB): m/e calcd for C32H32Cl3N6O12 [M]+
922.9736, found 922.9734.
8. Conners, K. A.. Binding Constants. In The Measurement of Molecular Complex
Stability;; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1987.
9. Zhong, Z.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9014–9015.