A. Indra et al. / Journal of Catalysis 284 (2011) 176–183
183
The drop in activities of recycled 1 and 2 is probably due the
References
presence of catalytically inactive 1-NBAL and 2-NBAL in the recy-
cled catalyst, rather than Ru-loss by leaching. For testing whether
or not leaching occurs from a polymer-supported catalyst, many
methods, including nanofiltration through an inorganic membrane,
have been reported [38]. However, in our case, Ru leaching may be
ruled out on the basis of the following two evidences. First, as al-
ready mentioned, direct Ru estimation by ICP-AES before and after
recycling does not show any Ru leaching. This is found to be the
case for both methods of catalyst recovery. Second, remarkably,
the drop in activity on recycle is found to be substrate specific. It
is observed only with NBAL and not with any other substrate. Thus,
hydrogenation of styrene with recycled 2 has been carried out for
four successive batches with negligible change in activity.
As mentioned earlier, the kinetic evidence clearly shows the for-
mation of 1-NBAL and 2-NBAL in a non-productive inhibitory equi-
librium. Before recycling, the separation of 1 and 2, from the
reaction mixture by filtration and solvent extraction or precipitation
(see Experimental), is unlikely to remove trace quantities of 1-NBAL
and 2-NBAL. As K2/K1 for 2 is ꢄ42, in the resting state of the catalyst,
the amount of 2-NBAL present is expected to be at least an order
morethanthatof2–2H. Inotherwords, therecycledcatalystconsists
of a mixture of 2-NBAL, 2–2H, and 2, with only the latter two species
but not the former contributing to the product-forming pathway.
This results in the observed decreases in activity on recycle.
[1] G.A. Somorjai, Y. Li, Top. Catal. 53 (2010) 832–847.
[2] C.P. Vinod, Catal. Today 154 (2010) 113–117.
[3] E. Schmidt, W. Kleist, F. Krumeich, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Chem. Eur. J. 16 (2010)
2181–2192.
[4] C.A. Witham, W. Huang, C.-K. Tsung, J.N. Kuhn, G.A. Somorjai, F.D. Toste, Nat.
Chem. 2 (2010) 36–41.
[5] S. Mostafa, F. Behafarid, J.R. Croy, L.K. Ono, L. Li, J.C. Yang, A.I. Frenkel, B.R.
Cuenya, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 15714–15719.
[6] F. Zaera, Acc. Chem. Res. 42 (2009) 1152–1160.
[7] P. Maity, C.S. Gopinath, S. Bhaduri, G.K. Lahiri, Green Chem. 11 (2009) 554–
561.
[8] A. Kulkarni, R.J. Lobo-Lapidus, B.C. Gates, Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 5997–
6015.
[9] J.M. Thomas, R. Raja, Top. Catal. 53 (2010) 848–858.
[10] R.D. Adams, E.M. Boswell, B. Captain, A.B. Hungria, P.A. Midgley, R. Raja, J.M.
Thomas, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 8182–8185.
[11] J.M. Thomas, R. Raja, D.W. Lewis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 6456–
6482.
[12] S. Bhaduri, V.S. Darshane, K. Sharma, D. Mukesh, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
(1992) 1738–1740.
[13] H. Paul, S. Bhaduri, G.K. Lahiri, Organometallics 22 (2003) 3019–3021.
[14] S. Basu, H. Paul, C.S. Gopinath, S. Bhaduri, G.K. Lahiri, J. Catal. 229 (2005) 298–
302.
[15] S. Basu, M. Mapa, C.S. Gopinath, D. Mukesh, S. Bhaduri, G.K. Lahiri, J. Catal. 239
(2006) 154–161.
[16] P. Maity, S. Basu, S. Bhaduri, G.K. Lahiri, Adv. Synth. Catal. 349 (2007) 1955–
1962.
[17] P. Maity, S. Basu, S. Bhaduri, G.K. Lahiri, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 270 (2007) 117–
122.
[18] A. Indra, M. Doble, S. Bhaduri, G.K. Lahiri, ACS Catal. 1 (2011) 511–518.
[19] A. Indra, S. Basu, D.G. Kulkarni, C.S. Gopinath, S. Bhaduri, G.K. Lahiri, Appl.
Catal. A 344 (2008) 124–130.
4. Conclusions
[20] M. Kidwai, V. Bansal, A. Saxena, R. Shankar, S. Mozumdar, Tetrahedron Lett. 47
(2006) 4161–4165.
[21] S. Rawale, L.M. Hrihorczuk, W. Wei, J. Zemlicka, J. Med. Chem. 45 (2002) 937–
943.
[22] R.A. Sheldon, Green Chem. 9 (2007) 1273–1283.
[23] R.A. Sheldon, Green Chem. 7 (2005) 267–278.
[24] J. Auge, Green Chem. 10 (2008) 225–231.
[25] A. Corma, P. Serna, P. Concepci, J.J. Calvino, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 8748–
8753.
[26] L. Liu, B. Qiao, Z. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. Deng, Chem. Commun. (2009) 653–655.
[27] L. Liu, B. Qiao, Y. Ma, J. Zhang, Y. Deng, Dalton Trans. (2008) 2542–2548.
[28] J.W. Koepke, J.R. Johnson, S.A.R. Knox, H.D. Kaesz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97 (1975)
3947–3952.
In conclusion, we find that [H3Ru4(CO)12]
ꢀ ion paired with func-
tionalized MCM-41 or water-soluble PDADMAC is an effective pre-
cursor for a nanoruthenium catalyst that selectively hydrogenates
aldehyde functionality in the presence of nitro- or cyano-group.
This chemoselectivity is not observed either with Ru/Al2O3(5%),
or with RuCl3 supported on poly(diallyldimethylammonium chlo-
ride). Kinetic analyses show two competitive equilibriums fol-
lowed by a rate-determining step. The rate expression, other
evidences, and previous reports strongly suggest the involvement
of Ru4 clusters as catalytic intermediates.
[29] F. Yang, E. Trufan, R.D. Adams, D.W. Goodman, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008)
14233–14235.
[30] J. Wang, H.F.M. Boelens, M.B. Thathagar, G. Rothenberg, ChemPhysChem 5
(2004) 93–98.
[31] F. Wada, M. Shimuta, T. Matsuda, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 62 (1989) 2709–2710.
[32] Y. Takenaka, T. Kiyosu, J.-C. Choi, T. Sakakura, H. Yasuda, Green Chem. 11
(2009) 1385–1390.
[33] R.M. Deshpande, A.N. Mahajan, M.M. Diwakar, P.S. Ozarde, R.V. Chaudhari, J.
Org. Chem. 69 (2004) 4835–4838.
[34] H.D. Burge, D.J. Collins, B.H. Davis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 19 (1980)
389–391.
[35] C.A. Jaska, I.J. Manners, Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 9776–9785.
[36] R. Rousseau, G.K. Schenter, J.L. Fulton, J.C. Linehan, M.H. Engelhard, T. Autrey, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 10516–10524.
Acknowledgments
Financial supports from CSIR, New Delhi, and Reliance Indus-
tries Limited, Mumbai, India, are gratefully acknowledged. The
suggestions of the reviewers at the revision stage were very
helpful.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
[37] E. Schmidt, A. Vargas, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 12358–
12367.
[38] A.V. Gaikwad, V. Boffa, J.E. ten Elshof, G. Rothenberg, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47
(2008) 5407–5410.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in