M. Adinolfi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 7863–7866
7865
Acknowledgements
The application of this strategy has been investigated
for the synthesis of a variety of useful saccharidic
building-blocks commonly prepared from peracetylated
glycosyl bromides. For example, the same synthetic
sequence was also applied to the gluco precursor 4 in
good overall yield (entry 2). It should be noted that the
orthoesterification reaction can be accomplished via a
one-pot procedure without any work-up of the iodina-
tion mixture, in contrast to the corresponding synthesis
via glycosyl bromides. In addition, the efficacy of the
whole synthetic sequence was not compromised by the
use of unpurified intermediates. The acetylated
orthoester 7 was prepared from the corresponding per-
acetylated D-mannose derivative 6 via an analogous
one-pot sequence of anomeric iodination and orthoes-
terification (entry 3). The sequence afforded the
product as a single diastereoisomer in 71% overall yield
after the final chromatographic purification.
Financial support by Ministero della Universita` e della
Ricerca Scientifica and access to the facilities of ‘Centro
di Metodologie Chimico-fisiche dell’Universita` di
Napoli’ are acknowledged.
References
1. Caputo, R.; Kunz, H.; Mastroianni, D.; Palumbo, G.;
Pedatella, S.; Solla, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 3147.
2. Ernst, B.; Winkler, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3081.
3. Ness, R. K.; Fletcher, H. G.; Hudson, C. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1950, 72, 2200.
4. Montero, J.-L.; Winum, J.-Y.; Leydet, A.; Kamal, M.;
Pavia, A. A.; Roque, J.-P. Carbohydr. Res. 1997, 297,
175.
5. Gervay, J.; Nguyen, T. N.; Hadd, M. J. Carbohydr. Res.
1997, 300, 119.
6. (a) Gervay, J.; Hadd, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6961;
(b) Bhat, A. S.; Gervay-Hague, J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
2081; (c) Ying, L.; Gervay-Hague, J. Carbohydr. Res.
2003, 338, 835.
7. (a) Hadd, M. J.; Gervay, J. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 320,
61; (b) Lam, S. N.; Gervay-Hague, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
2039; (c) Lam, S. N.; Gervay-Hague, J. Carbohydr. Res.
2002, 337, 1953.
8. Chervin, S. M.; Abada, P.; Koreeda, M. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 369.
9. Adinolfi, M.; Barone, G.; Iadonisi, A.; Schiattarella, M.
Synlett 2002, 269.
10. For a discussion on the problems associated with the
synthesis of glycosyl bromides and related references see:
Franz, A. H.; Wei, Y. Q.; Samoshin, V. V.; Gross, P. H.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7662.
Another interesting application of the protocol is repre-
sented by the synthesis of 1,2-ethylidenes, another class
of very useful precursors in carbohydrate chemistry.
These derivatives are routinely prepared by treating
glycosyl bromides with excess NaBH4, and (for gluco-
and galacto-derivatives) catalytic tetrabutylammonium
bromide in acetonitrile.12 The synthesis of these com-
pounds directly from peracetylated precursors has been
demonstrated starting from mannose and fucose deriva-
tives (entries 4 and 5, respectively). In these cases, after
the generation of the glycosyl iodide the initial solvent
(dichloromethane) was removed and replaced with ace-
tonitrile, then sodium borohydride and (only for entry
5) tetrabutylammoniun bromide were added. Also in
this case the one-pot sequence gave a useful yield with
minimization of the experimental operations. In addi-
tion, the generation of 1,2-ethylidenes from the interme-
diate glycosyl iodide turned out to be a faster process
than in the case of brominated intermediates.
11. Lemieux, R. U.; Morgan, A. R. Can. J. Chem. 1965, 43,
2199.
12. Betaneli, V. I.; Ovchinnicov, M. V.; Backinowsky, L. L.;
Kochetkov, N. K. Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 107, 285.
13. Hansen, T.; Krintel, S. L.; Daasbjerg, K.; Skrydstrup, N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6087.
A further application has been evaluated in the synthe-
sis of 1,2-glycals (entries 6-8). In this case the iodination
mixture was worked-up by a simple extraction and the
crude product from the organic phase was directly
subjected to elimination conditions as described for
anomeric bromides by Skrydstrup and co-workers
(Cp2Cl2Ti and manganese in THF).13 Also in this case
the elimination step required typically much shorter
times than with the corresponding glycosyl bromides
(2-4 h instead of more than 10 h).13 A practical applica-
tion of this approach was demonstrated in the synthesis
of the expensive lactal derivative 14 (entry 8).
14. General procedure for the synthesis of glycosyl iodides: the
peracetylated sugar (2 mmol) was coevaporated with dry
toluene and then dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane
(6 mL). To the solution were added I2 (711 mg, 2.8
mmol) and triethylsilane (450 mL, 2.8 mmol). The mixture
was refluxed until TLC analysis displayed complete con-
sumption of the peracetylated sugar (the glycosyl iodides
are partially unstable on TLC, especially in the case of
the fucose derivative), and then submitted to further
reactions.
In conclusion, an efficient procedure for the synthesis of
glycosyl iodides based on the use of cheap and easily
handled reagents has been described.14 These intermedi-
ates can be efficiently converted into 1,2-orthoesters or
-ethylidenes via a one-pot approach, while 1,2-glycals
can be readily obtained after a simple extractive work-
up of the iodination mixture.14
General procedure for preparation of 1,2-orthoesters. To
the above reaction mixture were sequentially added
lutidine (930 mL, 8 mmol), ethanol (680 mL, 12 mmol)
and tetrabutylammonium bromide (258 mg, 0.8 mmol).
The mixture was left to stir overnight at rt (in the case of
galacto- and manno-derivatives) or refluxed for 4 h (gluco
derivative). When the reaction was complete (TLC), the
mixture was concentrated and chromatographed on silica
gel (entry 3) or directly submitted to the deacetylation–
benzylation one-pot procedure (entries 1 and 2).
Supplementary material: Spectral data (1H and 13C
NMR) for all products in Table 1 are available.