1
290
. Conclusions
Gargi Mukherjee and Kumar Biradha
4
References
1
2
3
. (a) Desiraju G R and Steiner T 1999 In The weak hydro-
gen bond in structural chemistry and biology (Oxford:
Oxford University Press); (b) Zaworotko M J 2001 Chem.
Commun. p1
. (a) Desiraju G R 1989 In Crystal Engineering: The design
of organic solids (Amsterdam: Elsevier); (b) Desiraju
G R 1995 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 34 2311; (c) Etter M C
In our previous studies on the homologous series
of bis(pyridinecarboxamido)alkane (amide) and
bis(pyridyl)alkanediamides (reverse amide), it was
shown that the odd members display more propensi-
ties to adopt 3-dimensional structures compared to the
even ones and reverse amides show greater tendencies
to exhibit pyridine interferences in amide-to-amide
hydrogen bonding, i.e., N-H· · · N hydrogen bond is
more prevalent. However, structural studies on the
higher analogues of series show that the odd-even
alteration of dimensionality of network and hydrogen
bonding patterns gradually fades away with increase
in chain length. The lower analogues (n = 1, 3, 5) of
the series mainly exhibits diamondoid or quartz type
topology formed by N-H· · · N hydrogen bond. But in
case of seven membered (n = 7) derivatives of both the
series, we see that either 1D or 2D network is exhib-
ited. Further, pyridine interference in amide-to-amide
hydrogen bonding reduces and N-H· · · O interactions
play more important role in assembling the network
as we observed earlier in case of even analogues. For
example, molecule 2d of amide series has 2D net-
work and 3d of reverse amide series has 1D structure
which is iso-structural with its even member analogues
1
990 Acc. Chem. Res. 23 120
. (a) Nguyen T L, Fowler F W and Lauher J W 2001 J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 123 11057; (b) Das D and Desiraju G R
2
006 Chem. Asian J. 1 231; (c) Bis J A, Vishweshwar P,
Middleton R A and Zaworotko M J 2006 Cryst. Growth
Des. 6 1048
4
5
. (a) Sarkar M and Biradha K 2006 Cryst. Growth Des.
6
202; (b) Rajput L, Singha S and Biradha K 2007
Cryst. Growth Des. 7 2788; (c) Mukherjee G and Biradha
K 2011 Cryst. Growth Des. 11 924; (d) Sarkar M and
Biradha K 2005 Chem. Commun. 2229; (e) Biradha K and
Rajput L 2010 In Organic crystal engineering: Frontiers
in crystal engineering E R T Tiekink, J J Vittal and M J
Zaworotko (Eds.) (Chichester: John Wiley Publishers)
. (a) Boese R, Weiss H-C and Bläser D 1999 Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 38 988; (b) Thalladi V R, Boese R and Weiss H-C
2
000 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 1186; (c) Thalladi V R,
Boese R and Weiss H-C 2000 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39
918; (d) Thalladi V R, Nüsse M and Boese R 2000 J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 122 9227
6
7
. (a) Lauher J W, Chang Y L and Fowler F W 1992 Mol.
Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 211 99; (b) Zhao Y L and Wu Y D 2002
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 2002
. Batten S R and Robson R 1998 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37
1460
having -(CH )-group one less (n = 6, 3g) or one more
2
(
n = 8, 3h). Although there are only two crystal struc-
tures with higher spacers, the structural trend is pretty
clear from these structures.
8. (a) Craig D C, Dance I G and Garbutt R 1986 Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 25 165; (b) Ermer O 1988 J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 110 3747; (c) Ermer O and Eling A 1988
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 27 829; (d) Hoskins B F and
Robson R 1990 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 1546; (e) Simard
M, Su D and Wuest J D 1991 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 4696;
Supplementary Information
(
f) Copp S B, Subramanian S and Zaworotko M J 1992
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 8719; (g) Brunet P, Simard M and
Wuest J D 1997 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 2737; (h) Reddy
D S, Dewa T, Endo K and Aoyama Y 2000 Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 39 4266; (i) Men Y B, Sun J, Huang Z-T and
Zheng Q Y 2009 CrystEngComm 11 978
. Sheldrick G M 1997 In Program for the Solution and
Refinement of Crystal Structures, SHELX-97 (Germany:
University of Gottingen)
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the DST for financial sup-
port and DST-FIST for single crystal diffractometer.
GM thanks CSIR for a research fellowship.
9