6738
A. Khalafi-Nezhad, B. Mokhtari / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 6737–6739
Table 1. The results for dimethoxytritylation of uridine in the presence
of different solid bases at 140ꢁC
oxytrityl ether was formed after 3min at 900W (micro-
wave power) in moderately low yield. Efforts to obtain a
higher yield by increasing the irradiation time failed
resulting in depurination. To the best of our knowledge,
there is no previous report of the depurination of nucleo-
sides under microwave irradiation.
Base
Yield (%)
DABCO
DMAPa
84
72
15
20
27
Basic alumina
K2CO3
Cs2CO3
Because of the high relative solubility of the nucleosides
in 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium chloride (bmimCl),11
this ionic solvent was applied for the dimethoxytrityl-
ation of uridine. On this occasion the reaction took a long
time and did not give complete conversion of uridine to
50-dimethoxytrityluridine even after 6h at 120ꢁC. The
isolated yield of 50-dimethoxytrityluridine in this case
was less than 35%.
5min by grinding in a hot mortar. The results are sum-
marized in Table 2.
In order to choose the appropriate base, the reaction of
uridine with dimethoxytrityl chloride was carried out in
the presence of several solid bases. As shown in Table 1,
1,4-diazabicyclo[2,2,2]octane (DABCO) gave the highest
yield and was therefore selected as the base for subse-
quent reactions. Liquid bases cannot be used, because
of evaporation at the high temperature employed.
In conclusion, the use of this environmentally friendly
reaction system was found to be a very suitable proce-
dure for the preparation of some protected nucleosides.
Moreover, this methodology offers significant improve-
ments with regard to yield of the products and simplicity
of operation especially purification. We believe that this
procedure could be applied as a practical alternative to
previously reported methods.
The effect of temperature in the range of 100–150ꢁC was
investigated. The results showed that a temperature
range between 140 and 150ꢁC gave the best yields. Sub-
sequent studies showed that the presence of tetrabutyl-
ammonium bromide was essential for achieving an
efficient and fast reaction.
General procedure: Protection of the nucleoside was car-
ried out by grinding the mixture of nucleoside
(1.1mmol), dimethoxytrityl chloride (1mmol), DABCO
(1.3mmol) and tetrabutylammonium bromide (0.5g) in
a hot mortar for 5min (the mortar was placed in an oven
for 2h at 140ꢁC). The reaction mixture was then allowed
to cool, dissolved in EtOAc (50mL) and extracted with
5% NaHCO3. The organic layer was separated and
washed with water (2 · 30mL), dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 and after evaporation of the solvent the product
was further purified by column chromatography using
ethyl acetate/n-hexane (9/1) as the eluent.
As shown in Table 2, uridine, thymidine and adenosine
(entries 1, 4 and 5, respectively), were easily protected
using dimethoxytrityl chloride (DMTrCl) in high yields.
Trityl chloride (TrCl) and monomethoxytrityl chloride
(MMTrCl) have also been used as protecting groups in
this reaction (entries 2 and 3, respectively). We found
that there were no significant differences on the rate
and yields of reaction between these protective groups
and dimethoxytrityl chloride. We also tried to protect
the 50-hydroxyl function of guanosine and cytidine using
this method but all efforts failed and a mixture of several
unidentified products was obtained.
Acknowledgements
To gain a comparison between the effect of conventional
heating and microwave irradiation on this reaction, di-
methoxytritylation of uridine in the presence of DABCO
and tetrabutylammonium bromide under microwave
irradiation was carried out. The corresponding dimeth-
We thank Shiraz University research council for finan-
cial support of this work. We are grateful to Dr. G. Abs-
alan for helpful discussions. We also thank Mr. Sajedian
Fard for running the NMR spectra.
References and notes
Table 2. Selective tritylation of the 50-hydroxyl group of nucleosides in
the presence of DABCO and tetrabutylammonium bromide
1. (a) Robins, R. K.; Revankar, G. R. In Antiviral Drug
Development; DeClercq, E., Walker, R. T., Eds.; Plenum:
New York, 1998; (b) Sanghvai, Y. S.; Cook, P. D. In
Nucleosides and Nucleotides as Antitumor and Antiviral
Agents; Chu, C. K., Baker, D. C., Eds.; Plenum: New
York, 1993.
B
O
B
R2O
O
R2Cl, DABCO, n-Bu4NBr
HO
°
Grinding, 140 C
R1
HO
R1
HO
2. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New
York, 1999.
3. Schaller, H.; Weimann, G.; Lerch, B.; Khorana, H. G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 3821–3827.
4. Hakimelahi, G. H.; Proba, Z. A.; Ogelvie, K. K. Can. J.
Chem. 1982, 60, 1106–1113.
5. Hanessian, S.; Staub, A. P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973,
3555–3558.
Entry
B
R1
R2
DMTr 84
Tr 82
Yielda (%) Mp (ꢁC)
1
2
3
4
5
Uracil
Uracil
OH
OH
H
111–1124
105–10714
102–1043
121–1233
142–1444
Thymine
Thymine
Adenine OH
MMTr 85
DMTr 86
DMTr 79
H
a Isolated pure product.