Notes and references
1
2
T. A. Edwards and A. J. Wilson, Amino Acids, 2011, 1–12.
A. Patgiri, K. Yadav, P. S. Arora and D. Bar-Sagi, Nat. Chem.
Biol., 2011, 7, 585–587.
3
4
L. K. Henchey, S. Kushal, R. Dubey, R. N. Chapman, B. Z. Olenyuk
and P. S. Arora, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 941–943.
R. E. Moellering, M. Cornejo, T. N. Davis, C. Del Bianco,
J. C. Aster, S. C. Blacklow, A. L. Kung, D. G. Gilliland,
G. L. Verdine and J. E. Bradner, Nature, 2009, 462, 182–188.
L. D. Walensky, A. L. Kung, I. Escher, T. J. Malia, S. Barbuto,
R. D. Wright, G. Wagner, G. L. Verdine and S. J. Korsmeyer,
Science, 2004, 305, 1466–1470.
5
6
R. S. Harrison, N. E. Shepherd, H. N. Hoang, G. Ruiz-Gomez,
T. A. Hill, R. W. Driver, V. S. Desai, P. R. Young, G. Abbenante
and D. P. Fairlie, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2010, 107,
Fig. 4 NOESY correlation chart for 1. The glycine-3 residue is
N-alkylated. Filled rectangles indicate relative intensity of the
NOE cross-peaks. Empty rectangles indicate NOE that could not be
unambiguously assigned because of overlapping signals. Spectra were
1
1686–11691.
7
W. S. Horne, L. M. Johnson, T. J. Ketas, P. J. Klasse, M. Lu,
J. P. Moore and S. H. Gellman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
2009, 106, 14751–14756.
acquired in 20% trifluoroethanol-d
3
and PBS at 25 1C.
8 W. S. Horne and S. H. Gellman, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1399–1408.
D. Seebach and J. Gardiner, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1366–1375.
0 C. G. Cummings and A. D. Hamilton, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.,
010, 14, 341–346.
1 A. Patgiri, A. L. Jochim and P. S. Arora, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008,
1, 1289–1300.
2 R. Chapman, J. L. Kulp 3rd, A. Patgiri, N. R. Kallenbach,
C. Bracken and P. S. Arora, Biochemistry, 2008, 47, 4189–4195.
3 D. Wang, K. Chen, G. Dimartino and P. S. Arora, Org. Biomol.
Chem., 2006, 4, 4074–4081.
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
4 L. K. Henchey, J. R. Porter, I. Ghosh and P. S. Arora, ChemBioChem,
2
010, 11, 2104–2107.
5 D. Wang, M. Lu and P. S. Arora, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
879–1882.
6 A. Patgiri, M. R. Witten and P. S. Arora, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
010, 8, 1773–1776.
1
2
1
1
7 R. N. Chapman and P. S. Arora, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 5825–5828.
8 G. Dimartino, D. Wang, R. N. Chapman and P. S. Arora, Org.
Lett., 2005, 7, 2389–2392.
Fig. 5 Determination of teHBS 1 and HBS 2 binding affinity for
1
2
9 K. D. Roberts, J. N. Lambert, N. J. Ede and A. B. Bray, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1998, 39, 8357–8360.
0 F. T. Lung, C. R. King and P. P. Roller, Lett. Pept. Sci., 1999, 6, 45–49.
Mdm2 by a fluorescence-polarization assay.
compared the ability of teHBS 1, and HBS 2, to bind Mdm2 in
4
21 K. D. Roberts and N. J. Ede, J. Pept. Sci., 2007, 13, 811–821.
1
2
2 F. M. Brunel and P. E. Dawson, Chem. Commun., 2005, 20, 2552–2554.
3 R. Tugyi, G. Mezo, E. Fellinger, D. Andreu and F. Hudecz,
J. Pept. Sci., 2005, 11, 642–649.
a fluorescence polarization competition assay (Fig. 5). We
find that both artificial helices target Mdm2 with similar
2
¨
affinities; the calculated K ’s for 1 and 2 are 224 ꢁ 20 and
d
24 A. C. Joerger and A. R. Fersht, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2008, 77, 557–582.
25 J. K. Murray and S. H. Gellman, Biopolymers, 2007, 88, 657–686.
2
32 ꢁ 34 nM, respectively.
2
2
2
6 A. C. Gemperli, S. E. Rutledge, A. Maranda and A. Schepartz,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 1596–1597.
7 F. Bernal, A. F. Tyler, S. J. Korsmeyer, L. D. Walensky and
G. L. Verdine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 2456–2457.
8 J. H. Lee, Q. Zhang, S. Jo, S. C. Chai, M. Oh, W. Im, H. Lu and
H. S. Lim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 676–679.
We have presented a facile and efficient synthesis of
thioether-linked hydrogen-bond surrogate a-helices. The
traditional hydrocarbon-linked HBS helices have proven to
be an exciting class of protein domain mimetics; however,
their difficult synthesis has limited their usage. Facile
synthesis of the thioether linkage allows us to bypass the
ring-closing metathesis reaction–one of the key difficult
steps. We find that teHBS compares favourably to HBS
a-helices in conformational stability and protein targeting
potential. Studies are currently under way to use the
method developed here for the synthesis of focused libraries
of stabilized helices.
2
3
9 S. Shangary and S. Wang, Clin. Cancer Res., 2008, 14, 5318–5324.
0 F. Campbell, J. P. Plante, T. A. Edwards, S. L. Warriner and
A. J. Wilson, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 2344–2351.
3
1 H. Yin, G. I. Lee, H. S. Park, G. A. Payne, J. M. Rodriguez, S. M. Sebti
and A. D. Hamilton, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 2704–2707.
2 G. L. Ellman, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1959, 82, 70–77.
3
33 J. P. Badyal, A. M. Cameron, N. R. Cameron, D. M. Coe, R. Cox,
D. G. Davis, L. J. Oates, G. Oye and P. G. Steel, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2
001, 42, 8531–8533.
3
4 D. Wang, A. Chen, J. L. Kulp III and P. S. Arora, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2006, 128, 9248–9256.
35 N. E. Shepherd, H. N. Hoang, G. Abbenante and D. P. Fairlie,
We thank Drs. Susan and Neal Zondlo (University of
Delaware) for the His-Mdm2 construct. This work was
supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM073943).
Funding from the National Science Foundation (CHE-
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 2974–2983.
3
6 D. H. Chin, R. W. Woody, C. A. Rohl and R. L. Baldwin, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 15416–15421.
7 K. Wuthrich, NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Wiley, New York,
1986.
0
958457) in the form of an instrumentation grant is gratefully
3
acknowledged.
1
418 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1416–1418
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012