Preparation of Nanoscale Ni–B Amorphous Alloys and Their Application
Bai et al.
Table II. Hydrogenation of cinnamic acid over the Ni–B and Ni–Co–B
Foundation of Hebei Province (B2011201017) are grate-
fully acknowledged.
catalysts.a
Conversion of
Selectivity for
Catalyst
cinnamic acid (%)
hydrocinnamic acid (%)
References and Notes
Ni–B
50.7
32.2
29.9
50.0
69.3
46.2
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
1. L. J. Lauhon, M. S. Gudlksen, D. L. Wang, and C. M. Lieber, Nature
420, 57 (2002).
2. J. F. Deng, H. X. Li, and W. J. Wang, Catal. Today 51, 113 (1999).
3. B. J. Liaw, S. J. Chiang, S. W. Chen, and Y. Z. Chen, Appl. Catal.
A: Gen. 346, 179 (2008).
4. A. S. Kumar, K. K. R. Datta, T. S. Rao, K. V. Raghavan,
M. Eswaramoorthy, and B. V. S. Reddy, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.
12, 2000 (2012).
5. Y. Z. Chen, B. J. Liaw, and S. J. Chiang, Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
284, 97 (2005).
Ni–La–B
Ni–Ce–B
Ni–Zr–B
Ni–Co–B
Co–B
Notes: aReaction conditions: 3.0 g cinnamic acid, 0.05 g catalyst, 60 mL H2O,
temperature at 100 ꢀC, initial P(H2ꢁ = 2 MPa, and reaction time 1 h.
increase of hydrogen pressure. A 91.0% conversion could
be achieved with a hydrogen pressure of 3 MPa and com-
plete conversion could be achieved at a hydrogen pressure
of 5 MPa. Considering safety issues and the feasibility of
further applications, 3 MPa was selected as the appropriate
reaction pressure. Subsequently, the effect of reaction tem-
perature on the conversion of cinnamic acid was examined.
The conversion of cinnamic acid increased from 91.0%
to 100.0%, when the reaction temperature was increased
from 100 to 120 ꢀC and so 120 ꢀC was chosen as the opti-
mum reaction temperature. Thus, the conversion of cin-
namic acid and the selectivity for hydrocinnamic acid were
both 100.0% over Ni–Co–B under the optimized reaction
conditions, superior to that of Ni–B (85.9%) under the
6. H. Li, H. X. Li, W. L. Dai, W. J. Wang, Z. G. Fang, and J. F. Deng,
Appl. Surf. Sci. 152, 25 (1999).
7. J. B. Zheng, Z. Q. Xia, J. J. Li, W. K. Lai, X. D. Yi, B. H. Chen,
W. P. Fang, and H. L. Wan, Catal. Commun. 21, 18 (2012).
8. H. X. Li, H. S. Luo, L. Zhuang, W. L. Dai, and M. H. Qiao, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 203, 267 (2003).
9. H. X. Li, S. Y. Zhang, and H. S. Luo, Mater. Lett. 58, 2741 (2004).
10. L. F. Chen and Y. W. Chen, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 8866 (2006).
11. G. Y. Bai, L. B. Niu, M. D. Qiu, F. He, X. X. Fan, H. Y. Dou, and
X. F. Zhang, Catal. Commun. 12, 212 (2010).
12. J. H. Shen and Y. W. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 273, 265 (2007).
13. Y. W. Chen and N. Sasirekha, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 6248 (2009).
14. W. Y. Wang, Y. Q. Yang, H. Luo, H. Z. Peng, and F. Wang, Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 10936 (2011).
15. G. Y. Bai, Z. Zhao, L. B. Niu, H. X. Dong, M. D. Qiu, F. Li,
Q. Z. Chen, and G. F. Chen, Catal. Commun. 23, 34 (2012).
16. B. J. Liaw, C. H. Chen, and Y. Z. Chen, Chem. Eng. J. 157, 140 (2010).
17. K. S. Suslick, S. B. Choe, A. A. Cichowlas, and M. W. Grinstaff,
Delivered by Publishing Technology to: University of Waterloo
same conditions, and the same as the results of Pd-based
IP: 83.240.140.238 On: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 07:06:05
catalysts.21ꢀ24
Nature 353, 414 (1991).
18. J. Guo, Y. J. Hou, C. H. Yang, Y. Q. Wang, H. Q. He, and W. Li,
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
Catal. Commun. 16, 86 (2011).
19. J. Guo, Y. J. Hou, C. H. Yang, Y. Q. Wang, and L. N. Wang, Mater.
Lett. 67, 151 (2012).
4. CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, a series of metal modified nanoscale Ni–B
amorphous alloy catalysts was prepared by chemical
reduction and investigated in the selective hydrogenation
of cinnamic acid. Ni–Co–B showed the best catalytic
performance with both 100.0% conversion and selectiv-
ity for hydrocinnamic acid. The addition of Co was
believed not only to favor decreased agglomeration of the
active Ni species but also to contribute to adsorption of
hydrogen itself, resulting in the Ni–Co–B having smaller
particle size, larger BET area, higher H2-chemisorption,
and greater number of active species, accounting for its
excellent catalytic performance. Due to its good activ-
ity, environmentally friendly nature and low cost, the cat-
alytic system involving of Ni–Co–B is a potential catalyst
of choice to produce hydrocinnamic acid in large-scale
processes.
20. K. J. P. Narayana, P. Prabhakar, M. Vijayalakshmi, Y. Venkateswarlu,
and P. S. J. Krishna, Pol. J. Microbiol. 56, 191 (2007).
21. C. M. Park and M. S. Kwon, J. Park, Synth. 22, 3790 (2006).
22. A. J. Amali and R. K. Rana, Green Chem. 11, 1781 (2009).
23. V. Jurcik, S. P. Nolan, and C. S. J. Cazin, Chem. Eur. J. 15, 2509
(2009).
24. S. Banerjee, V. Balasanthiran, R. T. Koodali, and G. A. Sereda, Org.
Biomol. Chem. 8, 4316 (2010).
25. M. L. Kantam, R. Kishore, J. Yadav, M. Sudhakar, and
A. Venugopal, Adv. Synth. Catal. 354, 663 (2012).
26. V. Pandarus, G. Gingras, F. Beìland, R. Ciriminna, and M. Pagliaro,
Org. Process Res. Dev. 16, 1230 (2012).
27. L. F. Mabena, S. S. Ray, S. D. Mhlanga, and N. J. Coville, Appl.
Nanosci. 1, 67 (2011).
28. G. K. Rao, N. B. Gowda, and R. A. Ramakrishna, Synth. Commun.
42, 893 (2012).
29. Z. B. Yu, M. H. Qiao, H. X. Li, and J. F. Deng, Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
163, 1 (1997).
30. H. Li, J. Liu, S. H. Xie, M. H. Qiao, W. L. Dai, and H. X. Li, J.
Catal. 259, 104 (2008).
31. H. X. Li, H. Li, W. L. Dai, and M. H. Qiao, Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
238, 119 (2003).
32. G. W. Xie, W. Sun, and W. B. Li, Catal. Commun. 10, 333 (2008).
33. M. D. S. Lekgoathi, W. G. Augustyn, and J. Heveling, J. Nanosci.
Nanotechnol. 11, 7001 (2011).
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Professor
Laurence M. Harwood for his kind assistance. Finan-
cial support by the National Natural Science Foun-
dation of China (20806018) and Natural Science
Received: 28 October 2012. Accepted: 12 February 2013.
5016
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 13, 5012–5016, 2013