B.F.O. Nascimento et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 13 (2010) 395–398
397
In summary, the advantages of using activated MnO2 in por-
phyrinogen dehydrogenation reactions relatively to the traditional
quinone oxidants are, along with the use of a much more inexpen-
sive oxidizing agent, the absence of contamination with the corre-
sponding chlorin in the final product and the very straightforward
isolation workup. Hence, no lengthy chromatographic purifications
are required to separate the porphyrin from the chlorin contami-
nant, the excess of DDQ or o-cloranil and their reduction by-prod-
N
H
CH2Cl2, BF3.Et2O
N2, rt, 16 ºC)
HN
NH
PhCHO
+
N
H
H
N
ucts. Using MnO2
a
simple filtration and subsequent
recrystallization is enough to obtain the porphyrins in high purity.
Microwave irradiation lead to a pronounced decrease of the
amount of solvents used and drastically reduced the reaction time,
although slightly lower yields were obtained. It is our opinion that
these results are quite promising and further studies on these syn-
thetic methodologies are currently being addressed at our labora-
tories and will be presented in due time.
SiO2 60, MnO2
CH2Cl2, MnO2
CH2Cl2, MnO2
MW
(50 ºC, 10 min)
20%
MW
(100 ºC, 30 min)
22%
40 ºC, 16 h
32%
Acknowledgments
Financial support provided by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecno-
logia (SFRH/BD/41472/2007 Ph.D. Grant received by Bruno F.O.
Nascimento) and Chymiotechnon is gratefully acknowledged. The
authors also wish to thank Dr. Alexandra Rocha Gonsalves for the
mass spectrometry studies, the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Labo-
ratory of the Coimbra Chemistry Center, Universidade de Coimbra
(supported in part by Grant REEQ/481/QUI/2006 provided by Fun-
dação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, POCI-2010 and FEDER) for the
proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy data and Dr.
Arménio C. Serra for the helpful insights and proficient discussions.
N
H
N
N
H
N
1a
Scheme 4. Selective heterogeneous oxidation of porphyrinogen.
Table 3
Yields of porphyrins (1a–g) synthesized under microwave irradiation.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Compound
Yield (%)
Yield a(%)
Isolated mass (mg)
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
46
5
20
4
710
110
550
615
920
715
1150
30
36
50
30
55
15
12
20
12
25
References
[1] L.R. Milgrom, The Colours of Life, an Introduction to the Chemistry of
Porphyrins and Related Compounds, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.
[2] K.M. Kadish, K.M. Smith, R. Guilard, The Porphyrin Handbook, vol. 6, Academic
Press, San Diego, 2000.
[3] W. Schlesinger, A.H. Corwin, L.J. Sargen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72 (1950) 2867–
2871.
1g
a
Ref. [19].
[4] U. Eisner, J. Chem. Soc. (1957) 3461–3469.
[5] R. Bonnett, I.A.D. Gale, G.F. Stephenson, J. Chem. Soc. C (1967) 1168–1172.
[6] L. Jaquinod, in: K.M. Kadish, K.M. Smith, R. Guilard (Eds.), The Porphyrin
Handbook, vol. 1, Academic Press, San Diego, 2000, pp. 201–232.
[7] H. Scheer, in: D. Dolphin (Ed.), The Porphyrins, vol. 2, Academic Press, New
York, 1978, pp. 1–37.
[8] H. Rusell, H. Ball, G.D. Dorough, M.J. Calvin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68 (1946) 2278–
2281.
[9] H.H. Inhoffen, J.W. Buchler, R. Thomas, Tetrahedron Lett. (1969) 1141–1144.
[10] G.E. Ficken, R.P. Linstead, E. Stephen, M. Whalley, J. Chem. Soc. (1958) 3879–
3886.
[11] H.W. Whitlock Jr., R. Hanauer, M.Y. Oester, B.K. Bower, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91
(1969) 7485–7489.
[12] A.D. Adler, F.R. Longo, J.D. Finarelli, J. Goldmacher, J. Assour, J.L. Karsakoff, J.
Org. Chem. 32 (1967) 476–478.
[13] R.A.W. Johnstone, M.L.P.G. Nunes, M.M. Pereira, A.M.d’A. Rocha Gonsalves, A.C.
Serra, Heterocycles 43 (1996) 1423–1437.
[14] J.S. Lindsey, I.C. Schreiman, H.C. Hsu, P.C. Kearney, A.M. Marguerettaz, J. Org.
Chem. 52 (1987) 827–836.
Whitlock methodology, both from the economical and environ-
mental standpoints, despite the requirement of using a relatively
large excess of oxidant in our heterogeneous process. Additionally,
a simple filtration through SiO2 60 was sufficient to isolate the
chlorin compounds, thus avoiding the numerous and tedious
extraction processes and the rather complex chromatographic sep-
arations necessary in the conventional method. The selectivity in
the oxidation of the bacteriochlorin can be clearly seen in the syn-
thesis of chlorin 3g. From a mixture with a ratio of bacteriochlorin/
chlorin/porphyrin of 45/30/25 the chlorin was obtained in a mix-
ture of 70/30 with the corresponding porphyrin contaminant.
The amount of porphyrin remained unaltered after the dehydroge-
nation, showing that all the bacteriochlorin was oxidized to the
corresponding chlorin, without the oxidation of the chlorin to the
porphyrin taking place.
The substitution of quinones by activated MnO2 in the oxidation
of porphyrinogen revealed to be equally beneficial. Either under
conventional heating or microwave irradiation, manganese dioxide
proved to be an effective, inexpensive and eco-friendly oxidizing
agent, that also introduced the advantages of using heterogeneous
oxidants, easy removal from reaction media by filtration and pos-
sibility of use in excess without causing difficulties in purification.
[15] A.M.d’A. Rocha Gonsalves, M.M. Pereira, J. Heterocyclic Chem. 22 (1985) 931–
933.
[16] Porphyrin synthesis. The selected aryl aldehyde (10 mmol) and pyrrole
(10 mmol, 0.72 mL) are added to propionic acid (3.5 mL) and nitrobenzene
(1.5 mL) and thoroughly mixed in an appropriate thick-walled glass vial. The
reaction vessel is then tightly sealed with a Teflon cap and the reaction
mixture is magnetically stirred and heated at 200 °C for 5 min under focused
microwave irradiation with an initial power setting of 250 W. After cooling to
room temperature, the crude product mixture is purified through a 3 cm wide
column for flash chromatography packed with SiO2 60 (12 cm high) and eluted
with methylene chloride/n-hexane 5:1 v/v (1b, 1f), methylene chloride/ethyl
acetate 9:1 v/v (1c) or methylene chloride/ethyl acetate 1:1 v/v (1d). The red