48
J. Marcinkiewicz et al.
Inflamm. res.
that physiologically plausible variations in Br– concentration
will support neutrophil dependent defence system
(HOCl/TauCl) by formation of HOBr and TauBr, very
strong bactericidal agents. Importantly, TauBr, in contrast to
HOCl, at bactericidal concentrations (< 200 mM) does not
exert cytotoxic activity. The contribution of chlorinating and
brominating oxidants in bacterial killing, in the regulation of
inflammatory cells function and in tissue injury will also
depend on the interactions with other biologically active
agents present at a site of inflammation. For example, activ-
ity of HOCl may be neutralised by both, nitrites and H2O2
[28, 33], while activity of TauBr is affected only by the pres-
ence of H2O2 [4, 7].
In the present study we have also examined immunoreg-
ulatory potential of TauBr. The ability of TauBr to suppress
the production of inflammatory mediators by activated
macrophages was compared with that of TauCl. Both taurine
haloamines inhibited the generation of nitrites and cytokines
(TNF-, IL-6, IL-12, IL-10) in a similar, dose-dependent man-
ner. These results are in agreement with our recent findings
[26]. We have shown that TauBr and TauCl can induce
expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), a stress inducible
protein, in both non-activated and LPS-activated macro-
phages. Importantly, dose-dependent induction of HO-1 was
associated with a concomitant fall in NOS-2 protein level.
Thus, at a site of inflammation, TauCl andTauBr may provide
a link between taurine-dependent and HO-1-dependent cyto-
protective mechanisms.
In conclusion, the present study, together with previous
reports, suggests that TauBr may be a part of neutrophil
defence system [7]. TauBr is generated by neutrophil MPO-
halide system and at low non-toxic concentrations exerts
in vitro bactericidal activity, even stronger than TauCl.
Now, TauBr contribution to pathogen killing by phagocytes
in vivo remains to be established. TauBr shows similar to
TauCl capacity to modulate inflammation by induction of
heme oxygenase expression and by inhibition of inflamma-
tory mediators generation by activated macrophages. Thus,
bromide may be a previously unexpected, but important
component of neutrophil activity at a site of inflammation.
On the other hand, TauBr may be easily neutralised by
hydrogen peroxide generated by both bacteria and phago-
cytes at a site of inflammation. Nevertheless, further studies
are necessary to compare the effect of TauBr and TauCl on
the balance between pro-(TNF-a) and anti-(IL-10) inflam-
matory cytokines production by the cells engaged in inflam-
mation.
Discussion
Although the biological activities of both chlorinating and
brominating oxidants in vitro are in general well charac-
terised, the role of the latter in acute inflammatory response
is still the matter of discussion. For years bromide has attract-
ed little attention because its extracellular concentration is at
least 1,000-times lower than that of Cl– [1, 6]. Thus, it could
imply that in vivo chlorinating oxidants will strongly com-
pete with brominating oxidants limiting their physiological
role to minimum. Meanwhile, it has been reported that neu-
trophil myeloperoxidase generates chlorinating and bromi-
nating oxidants; the production of the latter was previously
ascribed solely to eosinophil peroxidase [4]. Moreover, it has
been shown that the bromination pathways operate when Cl-
concentrations are 1,000-times to 10,000-times higher than
Br– concentrations [7, 20]. Therefore, the bromination path-
ways may be physiologically relevant.
In this study we have compared some biological activi-
ties of micromolar concentrations of TauBr with these of
HOCl and TauCl, the major products of MPO-halide system.
These oxidants, generated by monocytes and neutrophils at
sites of inflammation, can be involved both in a host defence
mechanism and as a means of tissue injury [2, 5, 22]. How-
ever, their activity in vivo will depend not only on the local
concentrations, but also on their reactions with other reac-
tive species which may result in the formation of products
with new biological activities [24, 28, 30]. Indeed, our study
confirmed previous reports [4] that at physiological pH (pH
7.4) TauBr, but not TauCl, is decomposed by H2O2 to form
non active products. On the other hand, nitrite (NO2–), a
major end-product of nitric oxide metabolism, does not react
with TauBr and TauCl. Nitrite, however, competes with tau-
rine for reaction with HOCl to form nitryl chloride (NO2Cl)
[24, 30]. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that the balance
between H2O2 and nitrite at sites of inflammation will favour
either chlorinating or brominating oxidants (e.g TauCl vs
TauBr). The concentration of MPO-halide system products
which can be achieved in body fluids is difficult to estimate
due to their extremely high reactivity [8]. The chemical basis
of these reactions can be reduced to: oxidation of thiols;
halide substitution of activated C-H compounds; transhalo-
gation and hydrolytic degradation [5, 12, 23]. This may rise
doubts whether in vitro demonstrated activity of chlorinat-
ing and brominating oxidants is relevant to the situation in
vivo. Nevertheless, in our and others’ opinion [8], the phys-
iologically relevant parameter is not the concentration, but
rather the amount of HOCl, TauCl or TauBr to which a bio-
logical target is exposed. Stimulated neutrophils produce
200 nmol HOCl per 107 cells over 30 min [8]. Therefore, it
is, possible that the amounts of oxidants used in this study
could be achieved in vivo at sites of inflammation. Whether
TauBr at the physiological concentrations plays a role in
inflammation, is an additional question. Our study has
shown that TauBr and HOCl, at similar micromolar concen-
trations, exert strong microbicidal activity. At these condi-
tions TauCl did not kill bacteria. These results are in agree-
ment with the studies of Gaut et al. [7]. They have shown
that addition of low concentration (1 mM) of Br– markedly
increased bactericidal activity of the complete myeloperoxi-
dase-H2O2–Cl– system in vitro. Therefore, one may suggest
Acknowledgements. This study was supported by the grant from “Pol-
ish Pharmacy and Medicine development” and partly by Center of
Microbiological Research and Autovaccines Ltd., Krakow, Poland.
References
[1] Babior BM. Oxygen dependent microbial killing by phagocytes.
Engl J Med 1978; 298: 659–68.
[2] Hampton MB, Kettle AJ, Winterbourn CC. Inside the neutrophil
phagosome: oxidants, myeloperoxidase, and bacterial killing.
Blood 1998; 92: 3007–17.
[3] Jong EC, Henderson WR, Klebanoff SJ. Bactericidal activity of
eosinophil peroxidase. J Immunol 1980; 124: 1378–82.