7
798 Sun et al.
Asian J. Chem.
the overlap of p electrons to the 3d vacant orbital of Fe atoms,
1-(morpholinomethyl)indoline-2,3-dione is antifungal active
against SRB and IB, but inactive against TGB under both concen-
trations.
which conforms the adsorption of the compounds on the metal
2
1
surface . The inhibitive performance of 1-(morpholino-
methyl)indoline-2,3-dione can be explained on the presence
of polydentate nitrone and indolin which rises the possibility
Conclusion
22
1-(Morpholinomethyl)indoline-2,3-dione was synthesized
and the its anticorrosion characters and the mechanism on the
corrosion of high protective Q235A steel in HCl solution were
screened and discussed. The title compound can inhibit the
corrosion with moderate inhibition efficiency in different
conditions and the highest reaches to 81.9 % in 1M HCl with
the concentration of 1000 mg/L. Besides, it displays potent
activity against the oilfield water-borne bacteria, especially
for SRB and IB.
of transferring the unshared electron of this molecule to iron .
The possible reaction centers are unshared electron pair of
heteroatoms and/or π-electrons of aromatic ring. The schematic
illustration of different modes of adsorption on metal is shown
in Fig. 3.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was financially supported by Scientific Research
Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department
(
12JK0589).
Fig. 3. Absorption of 1-(morpholinomethyl)indoline-2,3-dione molecules
on the ion surface
REFERENCES
1
.
M. Yoshikawa, T. Murakami, A. Kishi, T. Sakurama, H. Matsuda, M.
Nomura, H. Matsuda and M. Kubo, Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo), 46,
Bioactivity: Microbiologically influenced corrosion
MIC) caused by growth of sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB),
(
886 (1998).
iron bacteria (IB) and total general bacteria (TGB) in oil
pipelines, is considered a major problem for water treatment
in the oil industry. Microbiologically influenced corrosion can
result in different types of attack: pitting, crevices, dealloying
2. G. Chen and X.J. Hao, Nat. Prod. Res. Dev., 22, 356 (2010).
3. G. Chen, X.J. Hao, Q.Y. Sun and J. Ding, Chemical Papers, 64, 673
(
2010).
G. Chen, H.P. He, J. Ding and X.J. Hao, Heterocycl. Commun., 15,
55 (2009).
4
.
3
17
and erosion in pipelines . Corrosion products produced by
microorganisms are production of hydrogen sulfide, molecular
hydrogen, hydrogen ions and destabilization of metal oxide
films. In addition, microbial degradation of crude oil can lead
to increased acidity in the oil phase and oil containing acids is
a problem concerning corrosion of pipelines. The reported
results showed that the interaction of IB, SRB and TGB
accelerated the corrosion rate and the corrosion in the mixture
of IB, SRB and TGB was more serious than in a single micro-
bial system. Different treatment system to inhibit corrosion
should be considered, among which bactericide agent has
received the greatest acceptance. Currently, oxidizer, aldehyde,
quaternary ammonium salt and heterocycle compounds has
5. G. Chen, J. Yang, S. Gao, H.P. He, S.L. Li,Y.T. Di,Y. Chang,Y. Lu and
X.J. Hao, Mol. Divers., 16, 151 (2012).
6
.
.
G. Chen, Y. Tang, J. Zhang, Y. Wu, X.-J. Hao and S.-Z. Mu, Lett. Org.
Chem., 8, 614 (2011).
M.A. Quraishi and H.K. Sharma, Mater. Chem. Phys., 78, 18 (2003).
H. Ju, Z.-P. Kai and Y. Li, Corros. Sci., 50, 865 (2008).
7
8
9. K.M. Ismail, Electrochim. Acta, 52, 7811 (2007).
1
0. M. Benabdellah, R. Touzani, A. Aouniti, A. Dafali, S. El Kadiri, B.
Hammouti and M. Benkaddour, Mater. Chem. Phys., 105, 373 (2007).
1. N. Soltani, M. Behpour, S.M. Ghoreishi and H. Naeimi, Corros. Sci.,
52, 1351 (2010).
1
12. G. Quartarone, T. Bellomi andA. Zingales, Corros. Sci., 45, 715 (2003).
1
3. S. Issaadi, T. Douadi, A. Zouaoui, S. Chafaa, M.A. Khan and G. Bouet,
Corros. Sci., 53, 1484 (2011).
1
4. J. Fang and J. Li, J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM, 593, 179 (2002).
15. M. Behpour, S.M. Ghoreishi, N. Soltani and M. Salavati-Niasari,
Corros. Sci., 51, 1073 (2009).
16. A. Yurt, A. Balaban, S.U. Kandemir, G. Bereket and B. Erk, Mater.
Chem. Phys., 85, 420 (2004).
been used as bactericide agents and Cl
2
, ClO , formaldehyde,
2
18
pentane-1,5-dial, trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA), etc. , but
the toxicity tests have been conducted on a limited selection.
The antifungal activity of 1-(morpholinomethyl)-indoline-2,3-
dione against oil field microorganism was tested under the
concentration of 0.20 and 0.02 g/L and the results were
summarized in Table-5. From the table, it can be found that
1
7. K. Stanly Jacob and G. Parameswaran, Corros. Sci., 52, 224 (2010).
18. G. Chen, H. Su, Y. Song, Y. Gao, J. Zhang, X. Hao and J. Zhao, Res.
Chem. Intermed., 39, 3669 (2013).
1
9. M.A. Quraishi, I. Ahamad, A.K. Singh, S.K. Shukla, B. Lal and V.
Singh, Mater. Chem. Phys., 112, 1035 (2008).
2
2
0. I. Ahamad, R. Prasad and M.A. Quraishi, Corros. Sci., 52, 1472 (2010).
1. A. Visa, M. Mracec, B. Maranescu, V. Maranescu, G. Ilia, A. Popa and
M. Mracec, Chem. Cent. J., 6, 91 (2012).
TABLE-5
ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF 1-(MORPHOLINOMETHYL)-
INDOLINE-2,3-DIONE AGAINST OILFIELD
WATER-BORNE BACTERIA
22. G. Chen, Y. Wang, H.P. He, S.L. Li, L.G. Zhou and X.J. Hao, Acta
Botany Yunnan, 29, 712 (2007).
Microbiotic concentration/mL
Concentration
SIB
110.0
0.0
IB
110.0
0.0
TGB
110.0
70.0
-
0
0
.20 g/L
.02 g/L
25.0
25.0
110.0