Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

100718-03-4

Post Buying Request

100718-03-4 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

100718-03-4 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 100718-03-4 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 1,0,0,7,1 and 8 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 0 and 3 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 100718-03:
(8*1)+(7*0)+(6*0)+(5*7)+(4*1)+(3*8)+(2*0)+(1*3)=74
74 % 10 = 4
So 100718-03-4 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

100718-03-4Downstream Products

100718-03-4Relevant articles and documents

Synthesis and muscarinic activity of a series of tertiary and quaternary N-substituted guvacine esters structurally related to arecoline and arecaidine propargyl ester

Wolf-Pflugmann,Lambrecht,Wess,Mutschler

, p. 539 - 544 (2007/10/02)

A series of tertiary and quaternary N-substituted guvacine (1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-3-carboxy-pyridine) methyl and propargyl esters have been synthesized and tested for muscarinic/antimuscarinic activity on rat ileum and electrically paced left atria. Arecoline and arecaidine propargyl ester (APE) as well as their corresponding N-demethyl derivatives, guvacoline (norarecoline) and guvacine propargyl ester, acted as full agonists at both atrial and ileal muscarinic receptors (range of pD2-values 6.09-8.07). However, in both preparations arecoline and APE were clearly more potent (up to 15-fold) than their N-demethyl analogues. Replacement of the N-methyl group in arecoline and APE by larger substituents (ethyl, n-propyl, n-butyl, benzyl, phenylethyl) as well as N-methylation resulted in a decrease or even a complete loss of agonistic activity. In both organs, the propargyl esters usually showed higher potency than the corresponding methyl ester analogues. N-Ethylguvacine propargyl ester and APE methiodide displayed pronounced agonistic activity in the atria (pD2 ? 6.5; intrinsic activity = 0.79 and 0.67, respectively) but behaved as competitive antagonists in the ileum (pA2 = 6.06 and 5.62, respectively). Beside the lower sensitivity to muscarinic agonists of the rat ileum as compared to rat atria, the cardioselective stimulant action of both agents may also be due to their ability to recognize structural differences between atrial M(2α) and ileal M(2β) muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 100718-03-4