253877-81-5Relevant articles and documents
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of symmetrically and unsymmetrically substituted methoctramine-related polyamines as muscular nicotinic receptor noncompetitive antagonists
Rosini, Michela,Budriesi, Roberta,Bixel, M. Gabriele,Bolognesi, Maria L.,Chiarini, Alberto,Hucho, Ferdinand,Krogsgaard-Larsen, Povl,Mellor, Ian R.,Minarini, Anna,Tumiatti, Vincenzo,Usherwood, Peter N. R.,Melchiorre, Carlo
, p. 5212 - 5223 (2007/10/03)
The universal template approach to drug design foresees that a polyamine can be modified in such a way to recognize any neurotransmitter receptor. Thus, hybrids of polymethylene tetraamines and philanthotoxins, exemplified by methoctramine (1) and PhTX-343 (2), respectively, were synthesized to produce novel inhibitors of muscular nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Polyamines 3-25 were synthesized and their biological profiles were evaluated at frog rectus abdominis muscle nicotinic receptors and guinea pig left atria (M2) and ileum longitudinal muscle (M3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. All of the compounds, like prototypes 1 and 2, were noncompetitive antagonists of nicotinic receptors while being, like 1, competitive antagonists at muscarinic M2 and M3 receptor subtypes. Interestingly, polyamines bearing a low number of methylenes between the nitrogen atoms, as in 3, 6, and 7, displayed a biological profile similar to that of 2: a noncompetitive antagonism at nicotinic receptors in the 7-25 μM range while not showing any antagonism for muscarinic receptors up to 10 μM. Increasing the number of methylenes separating these nitrogen atoms in methoctramine- related tetraamines resulted in a significant improvement in potency at nicotinic receptors. The most potent tetraamine was 19, bearing a 12 methylene spacer between the nitrogen atoms, which was 12-fold and 250-fold more potent than prototypes 1 and 2, respectively. Tetraamines 9-11, bearing a rather rigid spacer between the nitrogen atoms instead of the very flexible polymethylene chain, displayed a profile similar to that of 1 at nicotinic receptors, whereas a significant decrease in potency was observed at muscarinic M2 receptors. This finding may have relevance in understanding the mode of interaction with these receptors. Similarly, the constrained analogue 12 of methoctramine showed a decrease in potency at nicotinic and muscarinic M2 receptors, revealing that the tricyclic system, which incorporates the 2-methoxybenzylamine moiety of 1, does not represent a good pharmacophore for activity at these sites. A most intriguing finding was the observation that the photolabile tetraamine 22 was more potent than methoctramine at nicotinic receptors and, what is more important, it inhibited a closed state of the receptor.
