7162-59-6

Basic information

• Product Name: 2-N-HEXYLOXYBENZALDEHYDE
• Synonyms: TIMTEC-BB SBB007793;O-HEXYLOXYBENZALDEHYDE;2-N-HEXYLOXYBENZALDEHYDE;Benzaldehyde, 2-(hexyloxy)-;Benzaldehyde, o-(n-hexyloxy)-,
• CAS NO: 7162-59-6
• Molecular Formula: C₁₃H₁₈O₂
• Molecular Weight: 206.28
• Mol File: 7162-59-6.mol
• Article Data: 9

Chemical Properties

• Boiling Point: 132-134°C 0,5mm
• Flash Point: 132-134°C/0.5mm
• Appearance: /
• Density: 1.0176 (rough estimate)
• Vapor Pressure: 0.000494mmHg at 25°C
• Refractive Index: 1.5200
• Sensitive: Air Sensitive
• BRN: 2258613
• CAS DataBase Reference: 2-N-HEXYLOXYBENZALDEHYDE(CAS DataBase Reference)
• NIST Chemistry Reference: 2-N-HEXYLOXYBENZALDEHYDE(7162-59-6)
• EPA Substance Registry System: 2-N-HEXYLOXYBENZALDEHYDE(7162-59-6)

Safety Data

• Hazard Codes: Xn
• Statements: 22
• Safety Statements: 24/25
• Hazardous Substances Data: 7162-59-6(Hazardous Substances Data)

Usage

General Description

2-N-HEXYLOXYBENZALDEHYDE, also known as hexyl salicylaldehyde, is a chemical compound that belongs to the class of aromatic aldehydes. It is commonly used in the fragrance industry as a scenting agent and is often found in perfumes, cosmetics, and other personal care products. The compound has a sweet, floral, and slightly woody aroma, making it a popular ingredient in various fragrances. Additionally, it can also be used in the manufacture of other chemicals and as a flavoring agent in food products. 2-N-HEXYLOXYBENZALDEHYDE is typically synthesized through the chemical reaction of hexyl alcohol and salicylaldehyde, and its use is regulated by various safety and environmental guidelines to ensure proper handling and disposal.

InChI:InChI=1/C13H18O2/c1-2-3-4-7-10-15-13-9-6-5-8-12(13)11-14/h5-6,8-9,11H,2-4,7,10H2,1H3

Upstream product

• 111-25-1 1-bromo-hexane 
• 90-02-8 salicylaldehyde 
• 3351-71-1 [2-(hexyloxy)phenyl]methanol 

Downstream Products

• 101777-80-4 2-hexyloxy-benzaldehyde-semicarbazone 
• 3351-71-1 [2-(hexyloxy)phenyl]methanol 
• 13736-63-5 2-hexyloxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde 
• 1246755-66-7 C₂₅H₂₅N₃O 
• 1246755-67-8 C₃₈H₄₂N₄O₂ 
• 1448644-27-6 o-HOPF 
• 1428568-82-4 N-(2-(hexyloxy)benzylidene)methanamine 
• 2417-64-3 2-Hexyloxy-benzylbromid 
• 112562-38-6 2-(2-Hexyloxy-phenyl)-thiazolidine-3-carbothioic acid methylamide 
• 104090-66-6 2-<2-(hexyloxy)phenyl>-5-<(methylamino)methyl>-1,3,4-thiadiazole 

Relevant articles and documents

Multicolor Fluorescent Polymers Inspired from Green Fluorescent Protein

Mimicking the green fluorescent protein (GFP), multicolor fluorescent polymers possessing enhanced fluorescence have been developed and applied to single-excitation cell imaging. The GFP core chromophore was covalently linked to the azide-functionalized a

Synthesis of N-arylpyridinium salts bearing a nitrone spin trap as potential mitochondria-targeted antioxidants

The generation of excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mitochondria is responsible for much of the oxidative stress associated with ageing (aging), and mitochondrial dysfunction is part of the pathology of neurodegeneration and type 2 diabetes. Lipophilic pyridinium ions are known to accumulate in mitochondria and this paper describes a general route for the preparation of nitrone-containing N-arylpyridinium salts having a range of lipophilicities, as potential therapeutic antioxidants. The compatibility of nitrones with the Zincke reaction is the key to their synthesis. Their trapping of carbon-centred radicals and the EPR spectra of the resulting nitroxides are reported.

Quantitative structure-activity relationships of 2,4-diamino-5-(2-X- benzyl)pyrimidines versus bacterial and avian dihydrofolate reductase

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) have been formulated for a set of 15 2,4-diamino-5-(2-X-benzyl)pyrimidines versus dihydrofolate reductase from Lactobacillus casei and chicken liver. QSARs were also developed for comprehensive data sets containing mono-, di-, and trisubstituted benzyl derivatives. Particular emphasis was placed on the role played by ortho substituents in the overall binding process and subsequent inhibition of the catalytic process in both the prokaryotic and eucaryotic DHFRs. Comparisons between the two QSARs reveal subtle differences at specific positions which can be optimized to design more selective antibacterial agents.