Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

863670-33-1

Post Buying Request

863670-33-1 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

863670-33-1 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 863670-33-1 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 8,6,3,6,7 and 0 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 3 and 3 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 863670-33:
(8*8)+(7*6)+(6*3)+(5*6)+(4*7)+(3*0)+(2*3)+(1*3)=191
191 % 10 = 1
So 863670-33-1 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

863670-33-1Downstream Products

863670-33-1Relevant articles and documents

Small molecule quantification by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for metabolites of drugs and drug candidates

Dahal, Upendra P.,Jones, Jeffrey P.,Davis, John A.,Rock, Dan A.

, p. 2355 - 2360 (2011)

Identification and quantification of the metabolites of drugs and drug candidates are routinely performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The best practice is to generate a standard curve with the metabolite versus the internal standard. However, to avoid the difficulties in metabolite synthesis, standard curves are sometimes prepared using the substrate, assuming that the signal for substrate and the metabolite will be equivalent. We have tested the errors associated with this assumption using a series of very similar compounds that undergo common metabolic reactions using both conventional flow electrospray ionization LC-MS and low-flow captive spray ionization (CSI) LC-MS. The differences in standard curves for four different types of transformations (O-demethylation, N-demethylation, aromatic hydroxylation, and benzylic hydroxylation) are presented. The results demonstrate that the signals of the substrates compared with those of the metabolites are statistically different in 18 of the 20 substrate-metabolite combinations for both methods. The ratio of the slopes of the standard curves varied up to 4-fold but was slightly less for the CSI method. Copyright

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 863670-33-1