7506
M. Bruncko et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 7503–7506
Table 3
commercially available lead compound, NS1619 (9a). Develop-
ment of structure activity relationships was heavily influenced by
structure-based design based on X-ray structures of ligand bound
HSP90 complexes. Lead compounds exhibited binding affinities,
ATP-ase inhibition and cellular client protein degradation activities
comparable to or better than existing inhibitors. These compounds
may serve as viable leads for further optimization.
Cellular effect of HSP90 inhibitors on client protein knockdown and HSP70 up-
regulation in human tumor cell lines
Compound
In-cell western
Luciferase
reporter
Cell viability
assay
ErbB2 EC50
M)
HSP70 EC50
M)
Hif-1
M)
a
EC50
EC50, SKBR3a
a
a
a
(
l
(
l
(
l
(lM)
1 (17-AAG)
2 (VER-49009) 0.35
12g <0.10
<0.10
0.06
0.50
0.06
0.12
0.21
0.19
0.025
0.25
0.012
Acknowledgments
a
All determinations are triplicate values.
We thank Dr. Derek W. Nelson and Dr. Andrew Souers for their
help in preparing this manuscript.
References and notes
amides, sulfonamides and ureas 11. Demethylation with BBr3 pro-
vided 12 in good yields (Scheme 2).
1. Lindquist, S.; Craig, E. A. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1988, 22, 631.
2. Whitesell, L.; Lindquist, S. L. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 761.
3. Solit, D. B.; Chiosis, G. Drug Discovery Today 2008, 13, 38.
4. Karapanagiotou, E. M.; Syrigos, K.; Saif, M. W. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2009,
18, 161.
5. Isaacs, J. S.; Xu, W.; Neckers, L. Cancer Cell 2003, 3, 213.
6. Neckers, L.; Neckers, K. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2005, 10, 137.
7. Neckers, L.; Ivy, S. P. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2003, 15, 419.
8. O’Bryan, E.; Nimmanapalli, R.; Bhalla, K. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 1799.
9. Pandey, P.; Saleh, A.; Nakazawa, A.; Kumar, S.; Srinivasula, S. M.; Kumar, V.;
Weichselbaum, R.; Nalin, C.; Alnemri, E. S.; Kufe, D.; Kharbanda, S. EMBO J.
2000, 19, 4310.
10. Cardone, M. H.; Roy, N.; Stennicke, H. R.; Salvesen, G. S.; Franke, T. F.;
Stanbridge, E.; Frisch, S.; Reed, J. C. Science 1998, 282, 1318.
11. Workman, P. Trends Mol. Med. 2004, 10, 47.
12. Kamal, A.; Thao, L.; Sensintaffar, J.; Zhang, L.; Boehm, M. F.; Fritz, L. C.; Burrows,
F. J. Nature 2003, 425, 407.
All compounds maintained good binding affinities and aryl sul-
fonamides displayed improved enzymatic inhibition in the Mala-
chite green assay. 1-Naphthyl sulfonamide 12g showed activity
comparable to both radicicol (2) and VER-49009 (3) in this assay
(Table 2).
The X-ray crystal structure of 12g bound to HSP90 is shown in
Figure 4. The 1-naphthylsulfonamido moiety of 12g adopts a ‘bent-
back’ conformation possibly due to hydrophobic collapse, allowing
the sulfonamide group to engage in a water-mediated hydrogen
bond with Lys58. The orientation and binding of the 5-chloro-
2,4-dihydroxyphenyl ring is maintained as in previous structures.
The cellular effects of 12g, 17-AAG (1), and VER-49009 (3) were
first evaluated in viability assays in the SKBR3 human breast can-
cer cell line.28 Compound 12g displayed equal or greater cell killing
behavior than 17-AAG (1) or VER-49009 (3) (Table 3).
13. Hartl, F. U. Nature 1996, 381, 571.
14. Prince, T.; Matts, R. L. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 39975.
15. Marcu, M.; Chadli, A.; Bouhouche, I.; Catelli, M.; Neckers, L. J. Biol. Chem. 2000,
275, 37181.
16. Wegele, H.; Müller, L.; Buchner, J. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 151, 1.
17. Whitesell, L.; Mimnaugh, E. G.; De Costa, B.; Myers, C. E.; Neckers, L. M. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 8324.
Several assays were employed to directly examine the effects of
12g on the degradation of known HSP90 client proteins in human
18. Schulte, T. W.; Neckers, L. M. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1998, 42, 273.
19. Schulte, T. W.; Akinaga, S.; Soga, S.; Sullivan, W.; Stensgard, B.; Toft, D.;
Neckers, L. M. Cell Stress Chaperones 1998, 3, 100.
20. Neckers, L. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 1163.
21. Supko, J. G.; Hickman, R. L.; Grever, M. R.; Malspeis, L. Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol. 1995, 36, 305.
22. Chiosis, G. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 1183.
23. McDonald, E.; Jones, K.; Brough, P. A.; Drysdale, M. J.; Workman, P. Curr. Top.
Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 1193.
24. Wang, M.; Shen, G.; Blagg, B. S. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 169, 2459.
25. Holland, M.; Langton, P. D.; Standen, N. B.; Boyle, J. P. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1996,
117, 119.
tumor cell lines. Hypoxia induced factor 1
genic protein regulated by HSP90.29 Inhibition of HSP90 causes
degradation of Hif-1 and abolishes Hif-1 regulated transcription.
To examine the effect of HSP90 inhibitor 12g on the degradation of
Hif-1 , we developed a luciferase reporter assay in which the eno-
lase promoter (Hif-1 regulated) was used to drive the expression
of a reporter construct containing the luciferase gene. The Hif-1
regulated luciferase reporter construct was integrated into NSCLC
cell line H1299. Inhibition of Hif-1 mediated transcription results
a (Hif-1a) is an onco-
a
a
a
a
a
a
in a decrease in fluorescent signal. As shown in Table 3 and 17-AAG
(1), VER-49009 (3), and benzimidazolone 12g efficiently inhibit
luciferase activity with EC50 values of 120, 210, and 190 nM,
respectively.
It has been shown that HSP90 inhibition also leads to ErbB2
degradation and HSP70 up-regulation.30, 31 An in-cell western ap-
proach was developed for rapidly monitoring both degradation of
ErbB2 and induction of HSP70 in the SKBR3 cell line known for
its high overexpression of ErbB2.28 The results summarized in Ta-
ble 3 shows 12g to be equipotent to 17-AAG in modulating Erb2
and HSP70 in a cellular context.
26. Sharp, S. Y.; Prodromou, Ch.; Boxall, K.; Powers, M. V.; Holmes, J. L.; Box, G.;
Matthews, T. P.; Cheung, K.-M. J.; Kalusa, A.; James, K.; Hayes, A.; Hardcastle,
A.; Dymock, B.; Brough, P. A.; Barril, X.; Cansfield, J. E.; Wright, L.; Surgenor, A.;
Foloppe, N.; Hubbard, R. E.; Aherne, W.; Pearl, L.; Jones, K.; McDonald, E.;
Raynaud, F.; Eccles, S.; Drysdale, M.; Workman, P. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 64,
1198.
27. Dymock, B. W.; Barril, X.; Brough, P. A.; Cansfield, J. E.; Massey, A.; McDonald,
E.; Hubbard, R. E.; Surgenor, A.; Roughley, S. D.; Webb, P.; Workman, P.;
Wright, L.; Drysdale, M. J. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4212.
28. Xu, W.; Yuan, X.; Jung, Y. J.; Yang, Y.; Basso, A.; Rosen, N.; Chung, E. J.; Trepel, J.;
Neckers, L. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7777.
29. Minet, E.; Mottet, D.; Michel, G.; Roland, I.; Raes, M.; Remacle, J.; Michiels, C.
FEBS Lett. 1999, 460, 251.
30. Xu, W.; Mimnaugh, E.; Rosser, M. F. N.; Nicchitta, Ch.; Marcu, M.; Yarden, Y.;
Neckers, L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 3702.
31. Elo, M. A.; Kaarniranta, K.; Helminen, H. J.; Lammi, M. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta,
Mol. Cell Res. 2005, 1743, 115.
32. Chene, P.; Floersheimer, A.; Furet, P.; Schoepfer, J. WO 2006010594 A1.
In summary, we describe here the discovery of a novel series of
N-aryl-benzimidazolone HSP90 inhibitors targeting the N-terminal
ATP-ase site. Interestingly, Novartis has developed a parallel series
of benzimidazolone analogs32 that appears to be based on the same