Imine-Containing m-Phenylene Ethynylene Macrocycle
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 11, 2002 3553
conformation is the most stable state. Many of the
conformational states occurring during this inversion
process would not be planar, possibly compromising the
stacking ability of the macrocycle. This would result in
the observed decreased self-association constant of 1
relative to 2. Macrocycles experiencing nonplanar con-
formations would be expected to have a diminished
results of 1 in THF and macrocycle 2 in both acetone and
THF are well-described by the isodesmic model, a good
fit using this model could not be obtained for macrocycle
1 in acetone (Figure 3). This suggested that a different
type of self-association was being exhibited by 1 in
acetone, and thus a different model would be needed.
Previous reports have suggested that a modification
to the isodesmic model, in which the association constant
of dimerization (K2) is allowed to vary from the subse-
quent higher order association constants (i.e., all subse-
quent KE′s, which are assumed to be equal), may provide
a viable alternative when the isodesmic model fails.14 In
this new model, a K2 larger than KE′ represents a tight
dimerization followed by weaker isodesmic association
to form higher aggregates. On the other hand, a smaller
K2 indicates a disfavored dimerization followed by stron-
ger isodesmic association (essentially cooperative ag-
gregation). Our efforts to fit the chemical shift data of 1
in acetone-d6 solution to this alternative model using the
program Dynafit16 gave better agreement of the data to
the new model over the entire range of concentration that
was studied (Figure 5). Interestingly, the best fit K2
(12 700 M-1) was approximately 5 times larger than KE′
(2570 M-1). Although there have been reports of systems
1
stacking propensity.14 The H NMR spectra were care-
fully examined to investigate these potential conforma-
tional dynamics. Since only 11 distinct aromatic reso-
nances, including that of the imine proton, were observed
for macrocycle 1 at room temperature, it is suggested that
this crankshaft-like rotation was occurring rapidly in
solution on the NMR time scale. To investigate the time
scale of this interconversion, variable temperature 1H
NMR experiments were conducted in CD2Cl2. At low
temperatures, it was thought that the macrococyle might
become locked in a planar conformation, resulting in
some of the aromatic resonances splitting due to the
differentiated chemical environments of the protons.
Unfortunately, aggregation was observed as the temper-
ature was decreased, as evidenced by the upfield shifting
and line broadening of the resonances. It was thus not
possible to verify the existence of the isolated planar
macrocyclic conformation.
14
which exhibit a K2 larger than KE′ none of these sys-
Upfield shifting in 1H NMR spectra has been well-
documented as a signature of aromatic stacking interac-
tions.14,18 Previously in our laboratory it was demon-
strated that macrocycles 2 and 3, both of which have been
proven by vapor pressure osmometry to form intermo-
lecular aggregates in solution, experienced significant
upfield shifting of their aromatic protons in polar sol-
vents.7,19 This indicated that the π-π stacking interaction
between phenylene ethynylene units is sensitive to
tems have demonstrated such a significant magnitude
of difference between K2 and KE′ when both K2 and KE′
have substantial absolute values.
For neutral molecules without a significant steric
hindrance, like our macrocycle, a K2 smaller than KE′ is
usually expected and predominantly observed.14 This may
be attributed to the extra entropy expense involved in
dimerization. On the other hand, when K2 is found to be
larger than KE, steric hindrance related to further
association to the dimeric form or electrostatic repulsion
in charged molecules have been postulated as possible
reasons why a smaller KE′ is observed.14 However, neither
of these explanations satisfied our system here. A new
rational explanation was needed to account for the
peculiar, nonintuitive self-association behavior of mac-
rocycle 1. As previously demonstrated in our laboratory,
macrocycle 2 with a backbone exclusively composed of
phenylene ethynylene units followed the self-association
behavior predicted by the isodesmic model. The only
structural difference between macrocycles 1 and 2 is that
a pair of ethynylene units in 2 have been replaced by
polar imine bonds in 1. Along with this structural change,
a dipole moment is introduced into the originally apolar
framework.21 A pair of macrocycles with dipole moments
within their skeleton may prefer to orient in a certain
direction relative to each other when dimerizing, most
likely stacking in an antiparallel orientation with regard
to the -CHdN- units (Figure 8). If this hypothesis is
valid, the symmetry of the dimer would diminish or even
eliminate the charge separation, leading to the observed
weakness of the higher order association following the
tight dimerization.20,22
1
solvent polarity. H NMR spectra of macrocycle 1 dis-
played a similar solvent dependent upfield shifting and
resonance broadening, indicating that the macrocycle was
aggregating in solution and that the extent of self-
association was dependent upon the solvent polarity.20
The chemical shifts of 1 in a given solvent were also
sensitive to the macrocycle concentration, consistent with
increased intermolecular aggregation at higher concen-
tration.
The association constants obtained from the nonlinear
least-squares regression analysis in Mathematica were
fairly large (Table 2). Although the association constants
of 1 were smaller compared to those of macrocycle 2 in
the same solvent,7 the significant absolute values of KE
indicated that aggregation was occurring. Thus, the most
important conclusion is that imine bond does not severely
1
disrupt π-stacking. Surprisingly, although the H NMR
(18) (a) Pople, J . A. J . Chem. Phys. 1956, 24, 1111. (b) J ohnson, C.
E., J r.; Bovey, F. A. J . Chem. Phys. 1958, 29, 1012. (c) Giessner-Prettre,
C.; Pullman, B. Biopolymers 1976, 15, 2277. (d) Abraham, R. J .; Fell,
S. C. M.; Smith, K. M. Org. Magn. Reson. 1977, 9, 367. (e) Hamuro,
Y.; Geib, St. J .; Hamilton, A. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10587.
(19) Shetty, A. S.; Zhang, J .; Moore, J . S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 1019.
(20) Imine units brought into close vicinity of one another in dimeric
form may facilitate the imine metathesis/exchange reaction as shown
in Scheme 1. However, according to ref 5, we do not expect the reaction
to take place at an observed rate under the conditions of the NMR
experiments. Moreover, when macrocycle 1, at a concentration of 5
mM in CD3CN where 1 is proven to form aggregates, was treated with
catalytic amount of acid, the conditions under which the imine
metathesis/exchange reaction has been both reported5 and proven by
our independent study to proceed properly at room temperature, no
higher molecular weight product was observed by MALDI-TOF mass
spectroscopy. The high stability of 1 may result from the optimal planar
conformation of the hexameric macrocycle for aggregation.
Our previous studies on macrocycle 3, which has a disc-
shaped backbone and alkyl side chains, exhibited an
(21) Bulgarevitch, S. B.; Adamova, S. I.; Polunin, A. A.; Kogan, V.
A.; Osipov, O. A. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1977, 47, 1144.
(22) Results from crystallographic data search on aromatic imines
from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) supported out hy-
pothesis by showing that in the solid state aromatic imines exhibit a
preference to be aligned with phenyl rings intermolecularly stacked
face-to-face and imine units oriented antiparallel with respect to one
another.