4: IR n/cm-1: 1603 brw, 1437 w, 1077 brs, 987 m, 814 m, 726 w;
observed in the filtered samples. Furthermore, no palladium could
be detected by ICP-OES analysis of the filtrates.
specific surface area 319.9 m2 g-1; average pore volume 0.39 cc g-1;
-1
˚
average pore diameter 51.3 A; Pd loading 0.41 mmol g ; (DTG
profile Supplementary Info. Fig. B(b)†).
Acknowledgements
5: IR n/cm-1: 1612 w, 1448 w, 1074 brs, 993 m, 813 m; specific
surface area 278.1 m2 g-1; average pore volume 0.47 cc g-1; average
We are very grateful to EPSRC and PhosphonicS Ltd for CASE
support to AQ; to Dr Harold Toms at Queen Mary University
of London for solid state NMR spectra and to Professor Karin
Wilson at Cardiff University for the XPS.
-1
˚
pore diameter 72.4 A; Pd loading 0.59 mmol g .
6: IR n/cm-1: 1601 brw, 1435 w, 1070 brs, 972 m, 810 m, 694 w.
Specific surface area 238.2 m2 g-1; average pore volume 0.71 cc g-1;
-1
˚
average pore diameter 137.0 A; Pd loading 0.54 mmol g .
References
Procedure for hydrogenation
1 (a) R. A. Sheldon and H. van Bekkum, Fine Chemicals through
Heterogeneous Catalysis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001; (b) J. Meurig
Thomas and R. Raja, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 708–720.
2 C. E. Garrett and K. Prasad, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2004, 346, 889–900.
3 G. Alvez-Manoli, T. J. Pinnavaia, Z. Zhang, D. K. Lee, K. Marin-
Astorga, P. Rodriguez, F. Imbert, P. Reyes and N. Marin-Astorga,
Appl. Catal., A, 2010, 387, 26–34.
4 O. Dominguez-Quintero, S. Martinez, Y. Henriquez, L. D’Ornelas, H.
Krentzien and J. Osuna, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2003, 197, 185–19.
5 S. Banerjee, V. Balasanthiran, R. T. Koodali and G. A. Sereda, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 4316–4321.
6 J. Panpranot, K. Pattamakomsan, J. G. Goodwin and P. Praserthdam,
Catal. Commun., 2004, 5, 583–590.
7 N. Maity, S. Basu, M. Mapa, P. R. Rajamohanan, S. Ganapathy, C. S.
Gopinath, S. Bhaduri and G. K. Lahiri, J. Catal., 2006, 242, 332–339.
8 J. R. Chang, H. M. Lin, S. W. Cheng, C. K. Tseng, D. L. Tzou and S.
G. Shyu, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2010, 329, 27–35.
The substrate (10 mmol) and methanol (30 mL) were combined
with stirring in a vial and catalyst added. A glass cup was used to
partially cover the vial which was then transferred to a 250 mL
autoclave reactor. The vessel was purged with nitrogen three times
and then purged with hydrogen before being charged at the desired
pressure. The reaction mixtures were stirred and external heating
was applied as appropriate. After the given reaction time the
catalyst was filtered off, the solvent removed and the residue
analysed by 1H NMR (CDCl3) and GC.
Recycles were carried out with filtered catalyst after washing
with methanol.
Procedure for one-pot cross-coupling and hydrogenation catalysed
by 4
9 C. del Pozo, A. Corma, M. Iglesias and F. Sanchez, Organometallics,
2010, 29, 4491–4498.
10 M. Al-Hashimi, A. Qazi, A. C. Sullivan and J. R. H. Wilson, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem., 2007, 278, 160–164.
11 M. J. Climent, A. Corma and S. Iborra, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 1072–
1133.
The substrates, nitro-substituted aryl bromide (1 mmol), phenyl
boronic acid (1.5 mmol), base NaOtBu (0.12 g, 1.2 mmol), catalyst
4 (70 mg, 0.029 mmol, 2.9 mol % Pd) and isopropanol (4 mL) were
combined with stirring in a vial. A glass cup was used to partially
cover the vial which was then transferred to a 250 mL PTFE lined
autoclave reactor. The vessel was purged with nitrogen three times,
hydrogen twice and the mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 6 h under 10 bar hydrogen. The catalyst was filtered off, solvent
removed and the residue analysed by 1H NMR (CDCl3) and
GC.
12 (a) F. Fernandez, M. Gomez, S. Jansat, G. Muller, E. Martin, L. Flores-
Santos, P. X. Garcia, A. Acosta, A. Aghmiz, M. Gimenez-Pedros,
A. M. Masdeu-Bulto, M. Dieguez, C. Claver and M. A. Maestro,
Organometallics, 2005, 24, 3946; (b) C. Drexler, H. Paulus and H. Elias,
Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 1297.
13 (a) M. Cai, J. Zhou, H. Zhao and C. S. Song, J. Chem. Res., 2002,
76–78; (b) K. Y. Lee, H. S. Byeon, J. K. Yang, G. W. Cheong and S. W.
Han, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2007, 28, 880; (c) C. Ming-Zhong, Z.
Hong and H. Wen-Ying, Chin. J. Chem., 2005, 23, 443–447.
14 E. Spinner, J. Chem. Soc., 1964, 4217.
15 P. K. Gallagher and M. E. Gross, J. Therm. Anal., 1986, 31, 1231–1241.
16 IUPAC Recommendations, Pure Appl. Chem., 1994, 66, 1739.
17 (a) F. Figueras and B. Coq, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2001, 173, 117;
(b) G. Booth, Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-
VCH, Verlag, Germany, 2002; (c) R. Raja, V. B. Golovko, J. M. Thomas,
A. Berenguer-Murcia, W. Zhou, S. Xie and B. F. G. Johnson, Chem.
Commun., 2005, 2026–2028.
Recycles were carried out with filtered catalyst washed with
isopropanol.
Leaching tests
Reactions were interrupted at partial conversion (20 min for
nitrobenzene, 1 h for 1-octene and benzonitrile) and using a 0.2
micron filter, the catalyst was separated from the reaction solution.
Samples of the filtrates were taken and the partial conversion to
amine was measured. The hydrogenation reaction was allowed
to continue with the remaining filtrate and conversion measured
again after the required reaction time. No further conversion was
18 A. E. Gelder, S. D. Jackson and C. M. Lok, Chem. Commun., 2005,
522–524.
19 (a) C. F. Lane, Synthesis, 1975, 135; (b) Y. Niwa and M. Shimuzu, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 3720–3721.
20 X. B. Jiang, A. J. Minnaard, B. Hessen, B. L. Feringa, A. L. L.
Duchateau, J. G. O. Andrien, J. A. F. Boogers and J. G. De Vries,
Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 1503.
10642 | Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 10637–10642
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©