.
Angewandte
Communications
Although T3 can be converted into 3,3’-T2 by IRD, the
formation of 3,3’-T2 occurs mainly via rT3 as almost all the T4
in the reaction mixture is rapidly converted into rT3 by 13 and
14 (see Figures S14 and S15 in SI). Attempts to detect the
formation of T3 directly from T4 were unsuccessful, as T3
undergoes a rapid deiodination by IRD to produce 3,3’-T2.
However, 13 and 14 do mediate the conversion of T3 into 3,3’-
T2 by IRD when T3 was used as the starting material
(Figure 3). Interestingly, 13 and 14 do not mediate the ORD
of T3 to produce 3,5-T2, but these compounds can remove
iodine from 3,3’-T2 by ORD to produce 3-T1, thus indicating
that the ORD is not a favored process when two iodines are
present in the inner-ring. Similarly, the ORD of 3’-T1 was not
observed at lower concentrations of 13 and 14, whereas the
IRD of 3-T1 produced T0 as the final product (Figure 3).
Therefore, T4 is converted into the fully deiodinated deriv-
ative T0 through the rT3!3,3’-T2!3-T1 pathway, involving
two IRD reactions and two ORD reactions. When 13 and 14
were used in large excess (50 equiv), a complete conversion of
T4 into T0 was observed, an indication that 3’-T1 also
undergoes deiodination to give T0. The diiodo derivative 3,3’-
T2 serves as a common intermediate for both 3-T1 and 3’-T1.
Figure 4. Path A: ORD of 18 involving a nucleophilic attack of the
tellurium reagent at iodine atom in the keto form 21. Path B: Conver-
sion of T4 into rT3 by 13 involving a cooperative halogen and
chalcogen bonding. A similar mechanism is applicable for ORD.
supported by another study involving a selective conversion
of 18 into 19 by a sterically protected selenol.[5b] However, the
sequential removal of all the iodine atoms in T4 by 13 and 14
suggests that the deiodination of T4 may proceed by
a cooperative halogen and chalcogen bonding mechanism as
proposed earlier for 1–3 (Figure 4, Path B).[6c,d]
Recent evidence suggests that another mammalian deio-
dinase enzyme, iodotyrosine deiodinase (IYD), plays an
important role in thyroid gland.[9] This enzyme is responsible
for recovering iodide for subsequent reuse in T4 biosynthesis
and its mutation can lead to iodide deficiency and ultimately
hypothyroidism.[9b] IYD catalyzes the reductive deiodination
of 3,5-diiodo-l-tyrosine (DIT; Figure 5), which is produced as
À
These observations reveal that the reactivity of C I bonds in
T4 is remarkably altered upon deiodination.
The facile deiodination of T4 and its derivatives by 13 and
14 prompted us to check whether compounds having one
tellurol moiety without any additional thiol group can
mediate such deiodination. We treated T4 with the tellur-
ocysteine derivative 16 (obtained from the corresponding
ditelluride 15 by reduction with NaBH4; Figure 2) in 1:1 molar
ratio and monitored the reaction by HPLC. Interestingly, 16
was able to deiodinate T4, T3, and 3,5-T2, although the rate of
the reaction was much lower than that of 13 and 14
(Figure 2C). Almost no deiodination was observed when
either rT3 or 3,3’-T2 was used as a substrate. However, the
initial rate for the deiodination of T4 and T3 by 16 was found
to be significantly higher than that of 3 under identical
reaction conditions. Similarly, tellurophenol (PhTeH; 17;
obtained in situ by treatment of diphenyl ditelluride with
NaBH4) was able to deiodinate T4 and T3 and the activity was
lower than that of the other compounds (Figure 2C). In
contrast, no deiodination was observed when either T4 or T3
was treated with selenocysteine or selenophenol (PhSeH)
under similar experimental conditions.
A previous study on the deiodination of a T4 derivative,
the N-butyrylthyroxine methyl ester 18, revealed that tellu-
rium reagents such as NaHTe can remove iodine from the
outer-ring (Figure 4, Path A).[8] When 18 was treated with
4 equivalents of NaHTe in ethanol at 508C for 4 hours, the T3
derivative 19 (R = Me, R’ = COnPr) and 3,5-T2 derivative 20
(R = Me, R’ = COnPr) were obtained in 45 and 5% yield,
respectively, along with unreacted starting material (50%).[8]
The reason for the formation of 19 and 20 has been ascribed to
higher reactivity of the two outer-ring iodines as compared to
the inner-ring ones. It has been postulated that one of the
possible mechanistic pathways may involve an enol–keto
tautomerism of 18 into 21, and allows the tellurium nucleo-
phile to selectively attack at the outer-ring iodines to produce
19 and 20 (Figure 4, Path A).[8] This assumption was further
Figure 5. A) Deiodination of 3,5-diiodo-l-tyrosine (DIT) to 3-iodo-l-
tyrosine (MIT) by iodotyrosine deiodinase (IYD) using NADPH as
cofactor. The enzyme also catalyzes the deiodination of MIT to l-
tyrosine. B) Active site of IYD indicating the binding of MIT near the
flavin (FMN; PDB ID 3GFD).
a byproduct of T4 biosynthesis. In contrast to the iodothyr-
onine deiodinases, IYD does not use selenocysteine for the
deiodination. This enzyme belongs to the group of flavopro-
teins of the NADH oxidase/flavin reductase family. The
NADPH/FMNH2-dependent deiodination of DIT produces
3-iodo-l-tyrosine (MIT), which can be further deiodinated by
the same enzyme to produce l-tyrosine.[10] To understand
whether the selenium and tellurium compounds that deiodi-
nate T4 and its derivatives can mimic the function of IYD, we
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 7674 –7678