Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Paper
yields from 32 to 71% with a diastereomeric ratio of 1 : 1.5 25 g phosphomolybdic acid, 60 mL conc. H2SO4, 940 mL H2O].
(15 : 16) (for further epoxidation experiments see the ESI†). Preparative TLC was performed on precoated TLC plates SIL
First epoxide 15 was opened under aqueous acidic conditions. G-100 UV254 (20 cm × 20 cm) (Macherey-Nagel). NMR spectra
Herein we found that the epoxide was opened with high regio- were recorded on a Bruker Advance DRX/600 spectrometer.
selectivity at the allylic position through a trans-diaxial addition 1H-NMR analysis was performed at 600 MHz and 13C-NMR
of water. The all-trans product 17 was obtained in 60% yield and spectra were proton decoupled at 151 MHz. Chemical shifts are
97 : 3 er. We could identify a diagnostic long-range coupling con- reported in ppm relative to residual solvent signals (CDCl3:
1
stant of 1.3 Hz for 1- and 3-H (W-coupling), which shows the cis- 7.26 ppm for H-NMR and 77.16 ppm for 13C-NMR, DMSO-d6:
1
relationship of these protons. The spectral data were identical to 2.50 ppm for H-NMR and 39.52 ppm for 13C-NMR, MeOD-d4:
those published by Krohn et al.21 Finally, altersolanol A (1) was 3.31 ppm for 1H-NMR and 49.0 ppm for13C-NMR). The multi-
obtained in 61% yield with an enantiomeric ratio of 98 : 2 after plicity in NMR spectra is given in the following abbreviations: s,
the hydrolytic ring opening of epoxide 16. The correct classifi- singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet. The enan-
cation of epoxide opening for 1 was confirmed unambiguously tiomeric excess of the products was determined by HPLC
with an authentic sample of the natural product35 and the ana- (DIONEX GmbH, Chiralcel ODH, Chiralpak IA, Chiralpak IB,
lytics were in agreement with literature values.14,36
Chiralpak IC columns, flow 0.5 mL min−1, 25 °C). High resolu-
tion mass spectra were recorded by FT-IR-MS using electrospray
ionization (ESI+) (Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEXQ Model Trap
4000). Infrared data were recorded on
a
PerkinElmer
Conclusions
SpectrumOne instrument and PerkinElmer SpectrumTwo instru-
ment as neat samples. Melting points were measured on a
Büchi Melting Point B-540 instrument. Optical rotations were
recorded on an A. Krüss Optronic P8000 polarimeter.
In summary, we have successfully presented a new synthetic
strategy for altersolanol A and its first enantioselective total
synthesis. The key element of the synthesis was the asym-
metric D–A cycloaddition promoted by the BINOL/boron Lewis
acid complex in high yield with >95 : 5 dr and 98 : 2 er. Next
the consecutive synthetic route was used towards trans-diol 14
in 62% yield over four steps. The additional epoxidation led to
two diastereomers in a total yield of 71%, in which we could
determine the absolute configuration. In the last step,
aqueous acidic conditions led to epoxide opening and alterso-
lanol A (1) and its all-trans derivative 17 were obtained with
high enantiomeric ratios of 98 : 2 and 97 : 3, respectively.
Indirectly, we thus also proved the assumed stereochemical
outcome of the D–A reaction. The determination of the physio-
logical data from the synthesised products is in progress.
Activation of molecular sieves
The success of the asymmetric Diels–Alder reaction of dieno-
phile 5d and diene 6d promoted by (R)-L2, borane-THF
complex and glacial acetic acid is dependent on the activation
of 3 Å molecular sieves and the use of fresh, nitrogen flushed
glacial acetic acid.
The 3 Å molecular sieves were used directly at room temp-
erature without pre-drying in an oven. We used about 20 g of
3 Å molecular sieves (Carl Roth, molecular sieves 3 Å, 0.3 nm,
type 564, pearls, ø1.6–2.5 mm) for 250 mL of THF, and 3.5 g of
3 Å molecular sieves for 10 mL of glacial acetic acid. First the
3 Å molecular sieves were placed in a 250 mL flask, which was
heated to 450 °C with a heat gun for 15 min under high
vacuum (10−3 mbar). Further activation at 250 °C overnight
under high vacuum (10−3 mbar) was performed. After heating
for 18 h dry and degassed THF was obtained from the solvent
purification system [MB SPS-800 (M Braun)] and fresh glacial
acetic acid was transferred into the flasks with activated 3 Å
molecular sieves under an atmosphere of dry argon. To our
Experimental
Experimental procedures and characterization data for com-
pounds 5d, 6d and (R)-L2 are provided in the ESI.†
General information
Unless specified, the reactions were carried out by the standard knowledge, storage of both solvents over sieves for 48 h pro-
Schlenk-technique under dry Ar/N2 and magnetic stirring. All duced the optimal solvent dryness, which resulted in the best
reagents were used as purchased from commercial suppliers enantiomeric control for the asymmetric Diels–Alder reaction.
without further purification. Glassware was oven-dried at 120 °C One major problem was the use of glacial acetic acid, because
overnight. Solvents were dried and purified by conventional of its high hygroscopicity. A new bottle of glacial acetic acid
methods prior to use. THF and dichloromethane were used was used two to three times after opening (no more than two
directly from an MB SPS-800 (M Braun). Solvents for chromato- weeks after opening), otherwise the enantiomeric excess of the
graphy (petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, dichloromethane and Diels–Alder product dropped dramatically to 40 to 60% ee.
methanol) were distilled prior to use. Column chromatography
(1R,4aR,9aR)-1-((tert.Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-9a-chloro-8-
hydroxy-6-methoxy-3-methyl-1,4,4a,9a-tetrahydroanthracene-
9,10-dione (10)
was performed on silica gel 60, 0.040–0.063 nm
(230–400 mesh). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was per-
formed on silica gel POLY-GRAM® SIL G/U254 plates
(Macherey-Nagel) and was visualized with UV light (254/366 nm Following the “activation of molecular sieves” THF and glacial
UV-lamp) and cerium-molybdate-solution [10 g Ce(SO4)2·4 H2O, acetic acid were prepared. In a 100 mL Schlenk-tube (R)-L2
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2018, 16, 7674–7681 | 7677