M. Curini et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 2709–2711
2711
The important features of this method are: mild reac-
tion condition, simple work up and recyclable nature of
U. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8159; (d) Curini, M.;
Epifano, F.; Marcotullio, M. C.; Rosati, O.; Costantino,
U. Synth. Commun. 1999, 541–546; (e) Curini, M.; Epi-
fano, F.; Marcotullio, M. C.; Rosati, O. Synth. Commun.
1
5
the catalyst, the preparation of which does not require
1
4a
particular skill.
2000, 1319; (f) Curini, M.; Epifano, F.; Marcotullio, M.
In conclusion we report an efficient and selective
method for the preparation of 1,1-diacetates from alde-
hydes in solvent free conditions, and a selective regener-
ation of aromatic aldehydes from the corresponding
acylals using zirconium sulfophenyl phosphonate as
catalyst.
C.; Rosati, O. Synlett 2001, 1182; (g) Curini, M.; Epi-
fano, F.; Marcotullio, M. C.; Rosati, O. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 21, 4149.
15. The catalyst, washed with dichloromethane and dried at
160°C, can be reused for several experiments. The reac-
tion in entry 3 has been repeated three times with the
following yields: 90, 87, 88%.
6. Analytical data for 4-formylphenyl acetate. H NMR
1
1
Acknowledgements
(CDCl
and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (m, 1H),
.74 (br ddd, J=7.5, 1.2 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 9.82 (s, 1H);
3
, 200 MHz): l 2.38 (s, 3H), 7.35 (ddd J=8.0, 2.6
7
+
This work was supported by MURST ‘Progetto Chim-
ica dei Composti Organici di Interesse Biologico’, and
the CNR (Rome) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank
Professor U. Costantino for helpful discussions.
GC–MS (m/z) 93, 122, 164 (M ). Anal. calcd for
: C, 65.85; H, 4.91. Found: C, 65.82; H, 4.93.
C H O
9 8 3
17. Analytical data for selected compounds:
1
(2E)-3-Phenylprop-2-ene-1,1-diacetate: H NMR (CDCl
,
3
200 MHz): l 2.15 (s, 6H), 6.20 (dd J=15.1 and 6.8 Hz,
1
H), 6.75 (d, J=15.1 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.65 (m, 6H); GC–
+
References
MS (m/z) 77, 104, 131, 174, 234 (M ). Anal. calcd for
C H O : C, 66.66; H, 6.02. Found: C, 66.63; H, 6.05.
13
14
4
1
1
. (a) Green, T. W. M.; Wuts, P. M. G. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New
York, 1999; (b) Gregory, J. J. J. Chem. Soc. (B) 1970,
(4-Methoxyphenyl)methanediacetate: H NMR (CDCl ,
3
200 MHz): l 2.11 (s, 6H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 6.95 (d, J=8.5
Hz, 2H), 7.45 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (s, 1H); GC–MS
+
1
201.
(m/z) 77, 92, 109, 137, 179, 238 (M ). Anal. calcd for
2
3
. Snider, B. B.; Amin, S. G. Synth. Commun. 1978, 117.
. Freeman, I.; Karchetski, E. M. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1977,
C H O : C, 60.50; H, 5.92. Found: C, 60.48; H, 5.95.
12 14 5
18. Typical procedure for the preparation of 1,1-diacetates: To
a stirred suspension of aldehydes (1 mmol) and zirconium
sulfophenyl phosphonate (20 mg) acetic anhydride (3
mmol) was added at room temperature with progress of
reaction monitored by GC–MS. Stirring was continued
for the appropriate time (see Table 1). The catalyst was
then filtered and washed with dichloromethane, the
organic layer was washed twice with a 5% solution of
sodium bicarbonate, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate
and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was
purified by flash chromatography (eluent hexane/ethyl
acetate 19:1) or crystallization to give the corresponding
2
2, 335.
4
5
. (a) Scriabine, I. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1961, 1194; (b)
Michie, J. K.; Miller, J. A. Synthesis 1981, 824.
. (a) Thomas, J. M. Angew. Chem. 1988, 100, 1735; (b)
Thomas, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27,
1
673.
. Karimi, B.; Seradj, H.; Ebrahimian, R. G. Synlett 2000,
23.
6
7
6
. Carrigan, M. D.; Eash, K. J.; Oswald, M. C.; Mohan, R.
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8133.
8
9
. Norihiko, S.; Kuniaki, N.; Tsuneo, S. Synlett 2001, 1921.
. (a) Kumar, P.; Hedge, V. R.; Kumar, T. P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 601; (b) Pereira, C.; Gigante, B.; Marcelo-
Curto, M. J.; Carreyra, H.; Perot, G.; Guisnat, M. Syn-
thesis 1995, 1077.
1
1,1-diacetates. All compounds were characterized by H
17
NMR and GC–MS.
19. Typical procedure for the deprotection of 1,1-diacetates:
To a stirred solution of 1,1-diacetate (1 mmol) in com-
mercial dioxane (1 ml) was added zirconium sulfophenyl
phosphonate (20 mg) at 50°C. Stirring was continued for
the appropriate time (see Table 1) with progress of reac-
tion monitored by GC–MS. The catalyst was then filtered
and washed with dichloromethane. The organic layer was
washed twice with 5% solution of sodium bicarbonate,
dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated under reduced
pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatogra-
phy (eluent hexane/EtOAc 15:1) to give the correspond-
ing aldehydes.
1
1
1
0. Rajn, S. V. J. Chem. Res. (s) 1996, 68.
1. Joshi, M. V.; Narasimbam, C. S. J. Catal. 1993, 141, 308.
2. Jin, T. S.; Ma, Y. R.; Zhang, Z. H.; Li, T. S. Synth.
Commun. 1997, 3379.
1
1
3. Ballini, R.; Bordoni, M.; Bosica, G.; Maggi, R.; Sartori,
G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7587.
4. (a) Curini, M.; Rosati, O.; Pisani, E.; Costantino, U.
Synlett 1996, 333; (b) Curini, M.; Marcotullio, M. C.;
Pisani, E.; Rosati, O. Synlett 1997, 769; (c) Curini, M.;
Epifano, F.; Marcotullio, M. C.; Rosati, O.; Costantino,