9
,12
for AChE activity and inhibition studies.
Therefore,
in Scheme 1 and explained as follows: (1) compound 2 is a
hydrophobic compound with a maleimide group; (2) acetylth-
iocholine iodide (ATC) is a good substrate of AChE; i.e.,
ATC can be hydrolyzed into thiocholine in the presence of
AChE. Michael reaction of thiocholine with the maleimide
group in 2 would lead to the formation of an amphiphilic
compound 3; (3) such amphiphilic compound would induce
the aggregation of compound 1, and accordingly the fluo-
rescence of the ensemble would increase significantly; (4)
in the presence of the corresponding inhibitor the hydrolysis
of acetylthiocholine would be retarded, and as a result, a
smaller amount of the amphiphilic compound would be
generated. Consequently, the fluorescence enhancement for
the ensemble would be reduced. Therefore, the ensemble of
compounds 1 and 2 can be used for the AChE activity assay
and the inhibitor-screening by making use of the AIE feature
of TPE compounds.
convenient and continuous methods for AChE activity assay
and the inhibitor screening are still highly desired.
We have very recently described a convenient and
continuous fluorometric assay method for AChE and inhibitor
screening based on the ensemble of compound 1 (Scheme
) units and myristoylcholine
by making use of the aggregation-induced emission (AIE)
feature of tetraphenyl ethylene (TPE). This assay method
is based on the following facts: (1) in the presence of
myristoylcholine, an amphiphilic compound with one am-
monium group, aggregation of compound 1 occurred leading
to strong fluorescence; (2) myristoylcholine can easily be
hydrolyzed into myristic acid and choline in the presence of
AChE. Accordingly, the aggregation complex of compound
-
1
) with two sulfonate (-SO
3
1
3
1
and myristoylcholine formed in aqueous solution would
be disassembled because of the Coulombic repulsive interac-
tion between 1 and the hydrolysis product of myristoylcho-
line. As a result, the fluorescence of the ensemble decreases.
Compound 1 was prepared according to a previous
1
4
report. Compound 2 was obtained simply by the reaction
of maleic anhydride and dodectylamine, and compound 3
was obtained by further reaction of compound 2 with
thiocholine (see the Supporting Information). First, we
discuss the fluorescence enhancement of compound 1 in
the presence of compound 3 (Scheme 1), the Michael
adduct of compound 2 with thiocholine. As anticipated,
compound 1 [20 µM in HEPES (10 mM) buffer solution,
pH ) 7.35] showed rather weak fluorescence. After
addition of compound 3, the fluorescence of compound 1
increased greatly. For instance, the fluorescence intensity
at 490 nm for the aqueous solution of compound 1 (20
µM) was enhanced by 45.5 times when the concentration
of compound 3 in the ensemble reached 24 µM. In fact,
the fluorescence quantum yield of the solution of 1 (20
µM) increased from 0.0090 to 0.064 (by reference to
quinine hemisulfate monohydrate) after introduction of
compound 3 (24 µM) to the solution. Interestingly, the
fluorescence intensity of the ensemble solution of com-
pounds 1 and 3 increased almost linearly with the
concentration of compound 3 in the range of 0-20 µM
as displayed in the inset of Figure 1.
Scheme 1. (A) Chemical Structures of Compounds 1-3. (B)
Cascade Reactions among ATC, AChE, and Compound 2. (C)
Illustration of the Aggregation of Compound 1 in the Presence
of Compound 3
In this paper, we want to report an alternative fluorescence
turn-on assay method for AChE activity and the inhibitor-
screening based on the ensemble of compound 1 and
compound 2 (Scheme 1). The design rationale is illustrated
(
12) Rhee, I. K.; Van Rijn, R. M.; Verpoorte, R. Phytochem. Anal. 2003,
4, 127–131
13) Wang, M.; Gu, X. G.; Zhang, G. X.; Zhang, D. Q.; Zhu, D. B.
1
.
(
Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 4444–4449. It should be noted that several new
chemo-/biosensors based on AIE features of silole and TPE derivatives have
been described recently: (a) Hong, Y.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Tang, B Chem.
Commun. 2009, 4332–4353, and references cited therein. (b) Liu, J. Z.;
Lam, J. W. Y.; Tang, B. Z. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2009, 19,
2
49–285. (c) Peng, L.; Wang, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, D. Org.
Figure 1. Fluorescence spectra of the ensemble of compound 1
Lett. 2009, 11, 1943–1946. (d) Liu, L.; Zhang, G. X.; Xiang, J. F.; Zhang,
D. Q.; Zhu, D. B Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 458–461. (e) Wang, M.; Zhang,
D. Q.; Zhang, G. X.; Tang, Y. L.; Wang, S.; Zhu, D. B. Anal. Chem. 2008,
[20 µM in HEPES (10 mM) buffer solution, pH ) 7.35] in the
presence of different concentrations of compound 3 (from 0 to 1.2
equiv); inset shows the plot of fluorescence intensity of compound
8
0, 6443–6448. (f) Zhao, M. C.; Wang, M.; Liu, H. J.; Liu, D. S.; Zhang,
G. X.; Zhang, D. Q.; Zhu, D. B. Langmuir 2009, 25, 676–678. (g) Ning,
Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, Y; Qian, S; Cao, Y.; Tian, H. AdV. Funct.
Mater. 2007, 17, 3799–3807.
1
at 490 nm vs the concentration of compound 3.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 17, 2009
4015